Literature DB >> 9002097

Computer-generated recall letters for underimmunized children: how cost-effective?

T A Lieu1, S B Black, P Ray, J A Schwalbe, E M Lewis, A Lavetter, P A Morozumi, H R Shinefield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of computer-generated recall letters to parents of children overdue for immunizations.
METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included children of two facilities in a regional health maintenance organization. Parents of 20-month-olds who had not yet received a measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization were identified via a computerized immunization tracking system. One half were mailed personalized letters that included the recommended immunization schedule and a request to call for an appointment; the other half served as a control group. Receipt of the MMR between 20 and 24 months of age was evaluated with the computerized tracking system. A telephone survey was conducted with parents whose children had not received the MMR by 24 months. Decision analysis was used to project the theoretical outcomes and costs of a recall letter policy for other populations.
RESULTS: Among 20-month-old children 10% had not received the MMR; 289 families were included in the analysis. Of families who were mailed letters, 54% (82 of 153) received the MMR by 24 months of age, compared with 35% (47 of 136) of those in the control group (P = 0.001). The telephone survey was completed with 110 parents of children who still did not appear on the health plan computer as having received the MMR by 24 months. Fifteen percent said the child had received an immunization at an outside provider, and of the rest 62% said they had not been aware that an immunization was due. In the cost effectiveness analysis it was projected that recall letters would increase the immunization rate for the regional population of approximately 30000 children from 86% to 90% at a total cost of $5031 annually. The cost per additional child appropriately immunized was $4.04. In sensitivity analyses this cost effectiveness ratio varied depending on the baseline population coverage rate as well as the estimated effectiveness of recall letters.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-generated letters to recall children overdue for immunizations resulted in a higher proportion of children appropriately immunized in this setting. However, the strategy was not as cost-effective as intuition might suggest. Further studies in health maintenance organization (HMO) settings should compare the cost effectiveness of letters with other low cost strategies including automated telephone reminders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9002097     DOI: 10.1097/00006454-199701000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  13 in total

1.  Similarity of parents and physicians in the decision to vaccinate children against measles, mumps and rubella.

Authors:  P Kriwy
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  A randomized trial of the effect of centralized reminder/recall on immunizations and preventive care visits for adolescents.

Authors:  Peter G Szilagyi; Christina Albertin; Sharon G Humiston; Cynthia M Rand; Stanley Schaffer; Howard Brill; Joseph Stankaitis; Byung-Kwang Yoo; Aaron Blumkin; Shannon Stokley
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Effect of reminder notices on the timeliness of early childhood immunizations.

Authors:  G L Bjornson; D W Scheifele; C Lajeunesse; A Bell
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Registry-driven, community-based immunization outreach: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S A Wilcox; C P Koepke; R Levenson; J C Thalheimer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Improving Immunizations in Children: A Clinical Break-even Analysis.

Authors:  Kyle Bradford Jones; Chad Spain; Hannah Wright; Lisa H Gren
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-11-07

Review 6.  Increasing Coverage of Appropriate Vaccinations: A Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.

Authors:  Verughese Jacob; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; David P Hopkins; Jennifer Murphy Morgan; Adesola A Pitan; John M Clymer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates.

Authors:  Julie C Jacobson Vann; Peter Szilagyi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

8.  Attitudinal and demographic predictors of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) uptake during the UK catch-up campaign 2008-09: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Katrina Brown; Graham Fraser; Mary Ramsay; Ruth Shanley; Noel Cowley; Johan van Wijgerden; Penelope Toff; Michelle Falconer; Michael Hudson; John Green; J Simon Kroll; Charles Vincent; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Primary care strategies to improve childhood immunisation uptake in developed countries: systematic review.

Authors:  Nia Williams; Helen Woodward; Azeem Majeed; Sonia Saxena
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-10-25

Review 10.  Barriers to the use of reminder/recall interventions for immunizations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer A Pereira; Susan Quach; Christine L Heidebrecht; Sherman D Quan; Faron Kolbe; Michael Finkelstein; Jeffrey C Kwong
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.