Literature DB >> 9001941

Statically equivalent load and support conditions produce different hip joint contact pressures and periacetabular strains.

B K Bay1, A J Hamel, S A Olson, N A Sharkey.   

Abstract

The hip is a common site of orthopaedic trauma and disease, and considerable research has been directed toward understanding the development of contact pressures within the joint. Virtually all experimental studies to date have employed proximal femurs compressed along the joint reaction force vector into acetabulae explanted from cadaver pelves. This approach presumes that deformations of the acetabulum are highly localized, and that the pelvis is functionally a rigid body. We have developed a methodology that uses intact pelves loaded through simulation of the abductor mechanism. A direct comparison of the two techniques revealed significantly different joint contact characteristics and periacetabular strains. Fuji film measurements of contact area and pressure were more widely distributed across the acetabulum for the intact pelvis, with significant pressure development in anterior and posterior regions. Contact patterns in the explanted acetabulae were concentrated in the superior portion of the joint. Principal strains from three rosette gages placed near the acetabular rim were also significantly different for the two testing techniques, but were not substantially altered by the presence of Fuji film within the joint. The results indicate that deformation of the entire pelvis and the manner in which loads are applied significantly affect development of contact pressures within the hip joint, and that Fuji film is a suitable technique for recording those patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9001941     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00120-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Acetabular orientation: anatomical and functional measurement.

Authors:  Omri Lubovsky; David Wright; Michael Hardisty; Alex Kiss; Hans Kreder; Cari Whyne
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Contact stress distributions on the femoral head of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae).

Authors:  Karen L Troy; Thomas D Brown; Michael G Conzemius
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Effect of varus and valgus alignment on implant loading after proximal femur fracture fixation.

Authors:  Meir Marmor; Kate Liddle; Jenni Buckley; Amir Matityahu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-27

4.  Upward and inward displacements of the acetabular component increase stress on femoral head in single endoprothesis models.

Authors:  Zhiqi Zhang; Ming Fu; Yan Kang; Yi Chen; Weiming Liao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Specimen-specific predictions of contact stress under physiological loading in the human hip: validation and sensitivity studies.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Ashley L Kapron; Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-06-05

6.  Biomechanical factors in planning of periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Noushin Niknafs; Ryan J Murphy; Robert S Armiger; Jyri Lepistö; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-10

7.  Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xuyi Wang; Jianping Peng; Linlin Zhang; Hui Wang; Leisheng Jiang; Xiaodong Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Effects on hip stress following sacroiliac joint fixation: A finite element study.

Authors:  Amin Joukar; Ruchi D Chande; R Dana Carpenter; Derek P Lindsey; Deniz U Erbulut; Scott A Yerby; Bradley Duhon; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2019-10-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.