Literature DB >> 8998247

Effect of atenolol and reserpine on selected events in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program (SHEP).

J B Kostis1, K G Berge, B R Davis, C M Hawkins, J Probstfield.   

Abstract

The effect of atenolol and reserpine on incidence of strokes, coronary heart disease (CHD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and mortality was assessed in 4736 persons aged 60 years and older with isolated systolic hypertension. Participants were randomized to either chlorthalidone (2371), with step-up to atenolol, or reserpine if needed, or placebo (2365). The average baseline SBP/DBP was 170/77 mm Hg. In the active treatment group, step 1, dose 1 was chlorthalidone, 12.5 mg/day; dose 2 was 25 mg/day. For step 2, dose 1 was atenolol 25 mg/day (or reserpine 0.05 mg/day if atenolol was contraindicated); dose 2 was 50 mg/day (reserpine, 0.10 mg/day). During 4.5 years average follow-up, 32% (757) of the active treatment group were on atenolol, with an average exposure of two years and 8% (193) were on reserpine with an average exposure of 1.7 years. Overall there were 96 strokes, 140 CHD events and 289 CVD events among the 2365 active group participants. Using time-dependent lifetable regression with adjustment for several variables, the addition of either atenolol or reserpine to chlorthalidone did not substantially alter the risk ratios for chlorthalidone alone. The relative risk for CHD events for atenolol versus no atenolol was 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 0.58, 1.86) and for reserpine versus no reserpine was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.29, 2.96). The relative risk for atenolol were 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.54, 1.30) for death, 1.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.80, 2.28) for stroke, and 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 0.71, 1.61) for CVD. For reserpine, the corresponding relative risks and confidence intervals were 0.65 (0.26, 1.59) for death, 0.27 (0.04, 2.26) for stroke, and 0.55 (0.20, 1.49) for CVD. Thus, the beneficial effects in several outcomes in Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) were due to the treatment regimen of lowering blood pressure based on low-dose chlorthalidone (plus atenolol or reserpine as required to meet blood pressure criteria). Additional (independent) benefits attributable to atenolol or to reserpine were not identified. However, a greater number of patients might have been necessary to adequately evaluate potential differential effects of these drugs, especially for reserpine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8998247     DOI: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00363-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Reserpine-diuretic combinations in therapy of arterial hypertension. Current considerations].

Authors:  M Siepmann; W Kirch
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-12-15

Review 2.  Why beta-blockers are not cardioprotective in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Ehud Grossman; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Are beta-blockers efficacious as first-line therapy for hypertension in the elderly?

Authors:  Konrad Wink
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Beta-blockers and diuretics in antihypertensive therapy: the debate continues.

Authors:  F H Messerli
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2000-10

Review 5.  Rationale for fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of hypertension: the cycle repeats.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Meta-analyses of antihypertensive therapy: Are some of them misleading?

Authors:  E Grossman; U Goldbourt
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of reserpine for primary hypertension.

Authors:  Sandy D Shamon; Marco I Perez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 8.  Central sympatholytic drugs.

Authors:  Wanpen Vongpatanasin; Kazuomi Kario; Steven A Atlas; Ronald G Victor
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Getting to goal blood pressure: why reserpine deserves a second look.

Authors:  Joshua Barzilay; Richard Grimm; William Cushman; Alain G Bertoni; Jan Basile
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Should beta blockers be used in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly?

Authors:  L Michael Prisant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.