Literature DB >> 8994580

Localization of a peripheral patch: the role of blur and spatial frequency.

D M Levi1, S P Tripathy.   

Abstract

Peripheral vision serves to direct our attention and fixation to objects of interest. This requires that the visual system be capable of accurately localizing peripherally presented targets having different spatial structures. The question we address is "to what extent does stimulus spatial structure influence the precision of peripheral localization?" To address this issue, we measured the precision of spatial localization (with reference to a foveal target) for a single Gaussian or Gabor patch briefly presented in the periphery. For both stimuli, we find that when the standard deviation of the stimulus envelope (SD) is less than 1/5 the stimulus eccentricity, localization thresholds are independent of SD and are approximately 1/50 of eccentricity. For larger values of SD, localization thresholds increase linearly with increasing SD, and are approximately 1/5 of SD. The results hold over a range of eccentricities (from 2.5 to 10 deg) and stimulus contrasts (from near detection threshold to 80%). In addition, for Gabor patches, the results are independent of frequency, phase and orientation of the carrier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8994580     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00343-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Intrinsic position uncertainty explains detection and localization performance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Melchi Michel; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Precision of position signals for letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Target-flanker similarity effects reflect image segmentation not perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Sihan He; Qingzi Zheng; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Stronger saccadic suppression of displacement and blanking effect in children.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.