Literature DB >> 21257707

Intrinsic position uncertainty explains detection and localization performance in peripheral vision.

Melchi Michel1, Wilson S Geisler.   

Abstract

Efficient performance in visual detection tasks requires excluding signals from irrelevant spatial locations. Indeed, researchers have found that detection performance in many tasks involving multiple potential target locations can be explained by the uncertainty the added locations contribute to the task. A similar type of Location Uncertainty may arise within the visual system itself. Converging evidence from hyperacuity and crowding studies suggests that feature localization declines rapidly in peripheral vision. This decline should add inherent position uncertainty to detection tasks. The current study used a modified detection task to measure how intrinsic position uncertainty changes with eccentricity. Subjects judged whether a Gabor target appeared within a cued region of a noisy display. The eccentricity and size of the region varied across blocks. When subjects detected the target, they used a mouse to indicate its location. This allowed measurement of localization as well as detection errors. An ideal observer degraded with internal response noise and position noise (uncertainty) accounted for both the detection and localization performance of the subjects. The results suggest that position uncertainty grows linearly with visual eccentricity and is independent of target contrast. Intrinsic position uncertainty appears to be a critical factor limiting search and detection performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257707      PMCID: PMC3243920          DOI: 10.1167/11.1.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  49 in total

1.  Search for lesions in mammograms: statistical characterization of observer responses.

Authors:  François O Bochud; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Attending to forty-nine spatial positions at once.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; D P McKay; W O Shaffer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Localization of a peripheral patch: the role of blur and spatial frequency.

Authors:  D M Levi; S P Tripathy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Detectability of a luminance increment: effect of spatial uncertainty.

Authors:  T E Cohn; D J Lasley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1974-12

5.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Towards a general theory of the visual acuities for shape and spatial arrangement.

Authors:  R J Watt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification.

Authors:  A E Burgess; H Ghandeharian
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Detection of noisy visual targets: models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  R G Swensson; P F Judy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06
View more
  22 in total

1.  Choice of saccade endpoint under risk.

Authors:  John F Ackermann; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Image correlates of crowding in natural scenes.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin M Chin; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Local reliability weighting explains identification of partially masked objects in natural images.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Eric S Seemiller; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Temporal attention improves perception similarly at foveal and parafoveal locations.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Rachel N Denison; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Aaron Nizam; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Linking V1 Activity to Behavior.

Authors:  Eyal Seidemann; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.422

8.  Optimal and human eye movements to clustered low value cues to increase decision rewards during search.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Wade Schoonveld; Sheng Zhang; Stephen C Mack; Emre Akbas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual search under scotopic lighting conditions.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Alexander C Schütz; Melchi M Michel; Wilson S Geisler; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Psychometric functions of uncertain template matching observers.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.