Literature DB >> 8992918

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Ontario and New York State: which rate is right? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.

J V Tu1, C D Naylor, D Kumar, B A DeBuono, B J McNeil, E L Hannan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the rate of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is much higher in New York State than in Ontario.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the service context and clinical characteristics of patients having CABG surgery in New York and Ontario.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from cardiac surgery registries in New York and Ontario. PATIENTS: All 16,690 patients in New York and 5517 patients in Ontario who had isolated CABG surgery in 1993. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical characteristics of patients having CABG surgery and rates of CABG surgery by coronary anatomy.
RESULTS: The overall age-adjusted rate of isolated CABG surgery was 1.79 times (95% CI, 1.74 to 1.85) greater in New York than in Ontario. Patients who had CABG surgery in New York were more likely to be elderly and female and to have recently had myocardial infarction (P < 0.001), whereas patients who had CABG surgery in Ontario were more likely to have had left ventricular dysfunction and severe coronary artery disease (two-vessel disease with proximal left anterior descending disease, three-vessel disease, or left main disease) (P < 0.001). The relative rate of CABG surgery for left main disease was 2.53 times (CI, 2.35 to 2.73) greater in New York than in Ontario but was 8.97 times (CI, 8.01 to 10.06) greater for patients with limited coronary artery disease (one-vessel or two-vessel disease without proximal left anterior descending disease).
CONCLUSIONS: The higher rates of CABG surgery in New York are associated with higher rates of CABG surgery among the elderly, women, and patients who recently had myocardial infarction. Potential underservicing in Ontario is suggested by a lower rate of CABG surgery for left main disease; however, the higher rate of CABG surgery in New York is also associated with a strikingly higher rate of surgery in patients with limited coronary disease. Such trade-offs highlight the difficulty of defining an optimal rate of CABG surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8992918     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-1-199701010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

1.  Waiting lists for health care: a necessary evil?

Authors:  R F Davies
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: a phantom alternative?

Authors:  Madhu K Natarajan; Amiram Gafni; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Comparison of Care Patterns and Rehospitalizations for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in New York and Ontario.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Andrea D Hill; Damon C Scales; Robert A Fowler; May Hua
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-04

4.  The paradox of primary care.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Robert L Ferrer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Population rates of cardiac catheterization and yield of high-risk coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michelle M Graham; William A Ghali; Peter D Faris; P Diane Galbraith; Jack V Tu; Colleen M Norris; Ali Zentner; Merril L Knudtson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Population need for coronary revascularisation: are national targets for England credible?

Authors:  R M Martin; H Hemingway; D Gunnell; K R Karsch; A Baumbach; S Frankel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  New York's statistical model accurately predicts mortality risk for veterans who obtain private sector CABG.

Authors:  William B Weeks; Dorothy A Bazos; David M Bott; Rosemary Lombardo; Michael J Racz; Edward L Hannan; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Does aggressive care following acute myocardial infarction reduce mortality? Analysis with instrumental variables to compare effectiveness in Canadian and United States patient populations.

Authors:  Christine A Beck; John Penrod; Theresa W Gyorkos; Stan Shapiro; Louise Pilote
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  A comparison of cardiovascular procedure use between the United States and Canada.

Authors:  D K Verrilli; R Berenson; S J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The role of invasive therapies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  José C Nicolau; Pedro A Lemos; Maurício Wajngarten; Roberto R Giraldez; Carlos V Serrano; Eulógio E Martinez; Luciano M Baracioli; Roberto Kalil; Fábio B Jatene; Luis A Dallan; Luis B Puig; Noedir A Stolf
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.