Literature DB >> 8990969

Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation.

M R Brent1, T A Cartwright.   

Abstract

In order to acquire a lexicon, young children must segment speech into words, even though most words are unfamiliar to them. This is a non-trivial task because speech lacks any acoustic analog of the blank spaces between printed words. Two sources of information that might be useful for this task are distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints. Informally, distributional regularity refers to the intuition that sound sequences that occur frequently and in a variety of contexts are better candidates for the lexicon than those that occur rarely or in few contexts. We express that intuition formally by a class of functions called DR functions. We then put forth three hypotheses: First, that children segment using DR functions. Second, that they exploit phonotactic constraints on the possible pronunciations of words in their language. Specifically, they exploit both the requirement that every word must have a vowel and the constraints that languages impose on word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Third, that children learn which word-boundary clusters are permitted in their language by assuming that all permissible word-boundary clusters will eventually occur at utterance boundaries. Using computational simulation, we investigate the effectiveness of these strategies for segmenting broad phonetic transcripts of child-directed English. The results show that DR functions and phonotactic constraints can be used to significantly improve segmentation. Further, the contributions of DR functions and phonotactic constraints are largely independent, so using both yields better segmentation than using either one alone. Finally, learning the permissible word-boundary clusters from utterance boundaries does not degrade segmentation performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8990969     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00719-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  30 in total

1.  Lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues for speech segmentation.

Authors:  L D Sanders; H J Neville
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Statistical approaches to language acquisition and the self-organizing consciousness: a reversal of perspective.

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-03-05

3.  Quantitative Linguistic Predictors of Infants' Learning of Specific English Words.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley; Colman Humphrey
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy.

Authors:  Casey Lew-Williams; Bruna Pelucchi; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-08-02

5.  Diminutives facilitate word segmentation in natural speech: cross-linguistic evidence.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; Patricia J Brooks; Steven Gillis; Graham Samson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

6.  Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation.

Authors:  Elisabeth Beyersmann; Séverine Casalis; Johannes C Ziegler; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

7.  [Child-directed speech. Does it really help language acquisition?].

Authors:  S Meyer; M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  [Prosody, speech input and language acquisition].

Authors:  M Jungheim; S Miller; D Kühn; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Event-related potentials index segmentation of nonsense sounds.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Victoria Ameral; Kathryn Sayles
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Contributions of infant word learning to language development.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.