BACKGROUND: Determining the ratio of free to total prostate specific antigen (f-PSA to t-PSA, calculated as the percentage of f-PSA [f-PSA%]) in serum allow for a clearer distinction between patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) and patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) than determining the level of t-PSA alone. To find influencing factors on f-PSA%, the authors investigated prostate volume, TNM classification, and tumor stage. METHODS: The authors measured f-PSA and t-PSA in 36 men with untreated PCa (tumor classification: T1, 2, 3pNO, MO), 44 patients with BPH, and 54 healthy controls. Prostate volume was determined by transrectal ultrasound. RESULTS: The median values of t-PSA and f-PSA% were 7.8 micrograms/L and 10.5% in PCa patients, 4.3 micrograms/L and 20.8% in patients with BPH, and 1.4 micrograms/L and 23.6% in the control group. Patients with PCa had a significantly lower proportion of f-PSA than BPH patients and healthy men. There was no correlation of f-PSA% to TNM stage or tumor grade. In PCa patients a significant positive correlation (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.51, P < 0.001) was found between f-PSA% and prostate volume, whereas there was no significant correlation in BPH patients (r = -0.27, P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in f-PSA% between PCa and BPH patients with prostate volumes smaller than 40 cm3 (9.0% vs. 21.6%, P < 0.01) but not between patients in these 2 groups with prostate volumes exceeding 40 cm3 (15.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Determining the ratio of f-PSA to t-PSA to discriminate between PCa and BPH patients yields significant results only in men with a prostate volume of less than 40 cm3.
BACKGROUND: Determining the ratio of free to total prostate specific antigen (f-PSA to t-PSA, calculated as the percentage of f-PSA [f-PSA%]) in serum allow for a clearer distinction between patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) and patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) than determining the level of t-PSA alone. To find influencing factors on f-PSA%, the authors investigated prostate volume, TNM classification, and tumor stage. METHODS: The authors measured f-PSA and t-PSA in 36 men with untreated PCa (tumor classification: T1, 2, 3pNO, MO), 44 patients with BPH, and 54 healthy controls. Prostate volume was determined by transrectal ultrasound. RESULTS: The median values of t-PSA and f-PSA% were 7.8 micrograms/L and 10.5% in PCa patients, 4.3 micrograms/L and 20.8% in patients with BPH, and 1.4 micrograms/L and 23.6% in the control group. Patients with PCa had a significantly lower proportion of f-PSA than BPH patients and healthy men. There was no correlation of f-PSA% to TNM stage or tumor grade. In PCa patients a significant positive correlation (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.51, P < 0.001) was found between f-PSA% and prostate volume, whereas there was no significant correlation in BPH patients (r = -0.27, P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in f-PSA% between PCa and BPH patients with prostate volumes smaller than 40 cm3 (9.0% vs. 21.6%, P < 0.01) but not between patients in these 2 groups with prostate volumes exceeding 40 cm3 (15.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Determining the ratio of f-PSA to t-PSA to discriminate between PCa and BPH patients yields significant results only in men with a prostate volume of less than 40 cm3.
Authors: Carsten Stephan; Chuanliang Xu; Henning Cammann; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Hartwig Huland; Axel Semjonow; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan; Mark F Wildhagen; Bert G Blijenberg; Patrik Finne; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Klaus Jung; Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: L Martínez-Piñeiro; J M García Mediero; P González Gancedo; A Tabernero; D Lozano; J J López-Tello; J M Alonso-Dorrego; C Núñez; M L Picazo; R Madero; J J De La Peña Journal: World J Urol Date: 2004-02-20 Impact factor: 4.226