Literature DB >> 8988471

Electronic clinical trial protocol distribution via the World-Wide Web: a prototype for reducing costs and errors, improving accrual, and saving trees.

L B Afrin1, V Kuppuswamy, B Slater, R K Stuart.   

Abstract

Clinical trials today typically are inefficient, paper-based operations. Poor community physician awareness of available trials and difficult referral mechanisms also contribute to poor accrual. The Physicians Research Network (PRN) web was developed for more efficient trial protocol distribution and eligibility inquiries. The Medical University of South Carolina's Hollings Cancer Center trials program and two community oncology practices served as a testbed. In 581 man-hours over 18 months, 147 protocols were loaded into PRN. The trials program eliminated all protocol hardcopies except the masters, reduced photocopier use 59%, and saved 1.0 full-time equivalents (FTE), but 1.0 FTE was needed to manage PRN. There were no known security breaches, downtime, or content-related problems. Therefore, PRN is a paperless, user-preferred, reliable, secure method for distributing protocols and reducing distribution errors and delays because only a single copy of each protocol is maintained. Furthermore, PRN is being extended to serve other aspects of trial operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8988471      PMCID: PMC61195          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/4.1.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  17 in total

Review 1.  The PDQ (Physician Data Query), the cancer database, in oncological clinical practice.

Authors:  C Fare; D Ugolini
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  On clinical trial participation.

Authors:  B Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Why community physicians should encourage their patients to participate in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  N K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Participation of community medical oncologists in clinical research trials.

Authors:  J L Richardson; R Myrtle; J M Solis; J W Hisserich; D Oliver
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1986

Review 5.  The NHLBI model: a 25 year history.

Authors:  L Friedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  An evaluation of physician determinants in the referral of patients for cancer clinical trials in the community setting.

Authors:  R J Winn; J Miransky; J F Kerner; L Kennelly; R A Michaelson; S R Sturgeon
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1984

7.  Obstacles to the accrual of patients to clinical trials in the community setting.

Authors:  R J Winn
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  History of clinical trials.

Authors:  J Jenkins; S Hubbard
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 9.  Barriers to clinical trials. Part III: Knowledge and attitudes of health care providers.

Authors:  E G Mansour
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival.

Authors:  C A Stiller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pilot study of a point-of-use decision support tool for cancer clinical trials eligibility.

Authors:  P P Breitfeld; M Weisburd; J M Overhage; G Sledge; W M Tierney
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Design and implementation of a national clinical trials registry.

Authors:  A T McCray; N C Ide
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  When to use web-based surveys.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  The basis for using the Internet to support the information needs of primary care.

Authors:  E E Westberg; R A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Telehealth: the need for evaluation.

Authors:  D R Masys
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Federico Puma; Bassam Dahman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.