Literature DB >> 8054285

Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival.

C A Stiller1.   

Abstract

A review was carried out of the published literature on survival rates for cancer in relation to patterns of organisation of medical care, specifically treatment at specialist centres or at hospitals treating larger numbers of patients and treatment by protocol, usually within the context of a clinical trial. Centralised referral or entry to trials was frequently associated with a higher survival rate, particularly for the less common cancers, and was never found to be associated with a lower survival rate. Few studies were identified for any one cancer site and some antedated current methods of treatment. At a time when the health service in the United Kingdom is undergoing far-reaching organisational change, further research is needed to establish the most beneficial patterns of care for people with cancer. Population-based cancer registries are an invaluable source of data for such studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8054285      PMCID: PMC2033490          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  77 in total

1.  Variations in breast cancer management between a teaching and a non-teaching district.

Authors:  I Basnett; M Gill; J S Tobias
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Importance of district of residence and known primary site for bowel cancer survival: analysis of data from Wessex Cancer Registry.

Authors:  R M Pickering; I R Chadwell; L Mountney
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Patient and hospital characteristics related to in-hospital mortality after lung cancer resection.

Authors:  P S Romano; D H Mark
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer.

Authors:  D A Lazovich; E White; D B Thomas; R E Moe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  A collaborative study of differences in the survival rates of black patients and white patients with cancer.

Authors:  J Howard; B F Hankey; R S Greenberg; D F Austin; P Correa; V W Chen; S Durako
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer in the elderly. The Piedmont Oncology Association experience [see comment].

Authors:  K Christman; H B Muss; L D Case; V Stanley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Colorectal surgeons in district general hospitals produce similar survival outcomes to their teaching hospital colleagues: review of 5-year survivals in Manchester.

Authors:  R D Kingston; S Walsh; J Jeacock
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1992-08

8.  Treatment of cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  I S Fentiman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival.

Authors:  M Kogevinas; M G Marmot; A J Fox; P O Goldblatt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Protocol allocation and exclusion in two Danish randomised trials in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K Bertelsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Update on childhood rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  H P McDowell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Shared care--is it worth it for the patient?

Authors:  Iolo Doull
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Liberati; R Grilli; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

Review 4.  The rationale for a spine registry.

Authors:  C Röder; U Müller; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Participants in research.

Authors:  David L Sackett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-21

6.  Changes in glaucoma treatment and achieved IOP after introduction of new glaucoma medication.

Authors:  Rikkert van der Valk; Jan S A G Schouten; Carroll A B Webers; Fred Hendrikse; Martin H Prins
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Barriers to clinical trial participation: a comparison of rural and urban communities in South Carolina.

Authors:  Sei-Hill Kim; Andrea Tanner; Daniela B Friedman; Caroline Foster; Caroline D Bergeron
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-06

8.  Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-11

9.  Electronic clinical trial protocol distribution via the World-Wide Web: a prototype for reducing costs and errors, improving accrual, and saving trees.

Authors:  L B Afrin; V Kuppuswamy; B Slater; R K Stuart
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.