Literature DB >> 8988382

Rip hump correction and rotation of the lumbar spine after selective thoracic fusion.

A J Hosman1, G H Slot, J van Limbeek, W J Beijneveld.   

Abstract

In this study a series of 32 patients with idiopathic scoliosis, managed with selective thoracic fusion, was reviewed. Classified according to King and instrumented with the H-frame, the patients were evaluated for curve correction, rib hump correction and postoperative shift in lumbar rotation. Age and follow-up average 19.4 and 2.4 years, respectively. The 32 patients had an average primary and lumbar curve correction of, respectively, 66% (6.0% correction loss) and 53% (3.4% correction loss). The respective values for postoperative rib hump correction and shift in apical lumbar rotation averaged 8 degrees and 9.4 degrees in type II King curves 4.4 degrees and 3.5 degrees in type III and 11 degrees and -5 degrees in Type IV. Significant differences were noted between the curve types in rib hump correction and shift in lumbar rotation. The study showed that en bloc postoperative rotation of the compensatory lumbar segment, directed towards the rib hump, positively influences rib hump correction. This en bloc rotation of the unfused lumbar segments is induced by the correcting forces applied by the instrumentation. The unfused lumbar spine of a patient with a King type II curve shows a larger lumbar rotation shift and subsequent rib hump correction than that of a patient with a King type III curve. Together with factors such as lateral angulation, rib-vertebra angles and structural limitations, the rotational dynamics of the unfused lumbar spine seem to form an important component in the under-standing and surgical management of scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8988382     DOI: 10.1007/bf00301967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Rotational lordosis; the development of single curve.

Authors:  E W SOMERVILLE
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1952-08

2.  Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic curve.

Authors:  B S Richards
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) instrumentation for the correction of spinal curvature. First results in special consideration of derotation.

Authors:  R Bauer; A Mostegl; R Hingshammer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1988

4.  Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M L Ecker; R R Betz; P S Trent; S Mahboubi; M Mesgarzadeh; A Bonakdapour; D S Drummond; M Clancy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Posterior instrumentation in scoliosis.

Authors:  J K Webb; R G Burwell; A A Cole; I Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Rotational changes of the vertebral-pelvic axis following Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  K B Wood; E E Transfeldt; J W Ogilvie; M J Schendel; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Spinal decompensation in Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  D E Mason; P Carango
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Correction of idiopathic scoliosis using the H-frame system.

Authors:  A J Hosman; G H Slot; W J Beijneveld; J van Limbeek; M A Kooijman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment.

Authors:  T Thulbourne; R Gillespie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-02

10.  Rotation vector, a new method for representation of three-dimensional deformity in scoliosis.

Authors:  T Kojima; T Kurokawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.