Literature DB >> 1523513

Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic curve.

B S Richards1.   

Abstract

Twenty-four patients with King Type II scoliosis were retrospectively studied to determine if preoperative assessment of lumbar curve flexibility was predictive of postoperative spinal balance. All patients had preoperative lumbar curves exceeding 40 degrees and all underwent selective thoracic fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset or Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation. The lumbar curves corrected 73% on preoperative bend radiographs. Despite this significant flexibility, the lumbar curves remained larger after surgery than the instrumented thoracic curves and spinal imbalance occurred. This finding was due, in part, to postoperative persistence of obliquity between L4 and the pelvis. When using Cotrel-Dubousset or Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation, preoperative assessment of the large lumbar curve's flexibility is not particularly helpful in predicting its response to selective thoracic fusion, especially regarding whether postoperative imbalance may occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1523513     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199208001-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: what if we choose lumbar apical vertebra as distal fusion end?

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Selective thoracic fusion in AIS curves: the definition of target outcomes improves the prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Heidrun Albrecht; Rene Schmidt; Juliane Zenner; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective anterior instrumentation and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis of Lenke type C.

Authors:  Ulf Liljenqvist; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Radiographic evaluation of selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Bingfang Zeng; Jianguang Xu; Hua Chen; Tao Zhang; Wei Zhou; Weiqing Kong; Yishan Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Extensive fusion for Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: a two year radiographic follow-up.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Dror Ovadia
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  The Surgical Overcorrection of Lenke Type 1 Deformities with Selective Fusion Segments: What Happens to the Coronal Balance?

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Sinan Erdogan; Yunus Emre Akman; Murat Mert; Engin Carkci; Tolga Tuzuner
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-09-30

Review 8.  Posterior instrumentation in scoliosis.

Authors:  J K Webb; R G Burwell; A A Cole; I Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Frontal and sagittal imbalance in patients with adolescent idiopathic deformity.

Authors:  Ozren Kubat; Dror Ovadia
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

10.  Correction of idiopathic scoliosis using the H-frame system.

Authors:  A J Hosman; G H Slot; W J Beijneveld; J van Limbeek; M A Kooijman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.