Literature DB >> 8988093

Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: an experimental study.

L R Mello1, L T Feltrin, P T Fontes Neto, F A Ferraz.   

Abstract

In the search for a new synthetic substitute for the dura mater, the authors conducted a research study using 32 mongrel dogs divided into three groups. Group I animals (21 dogs) underwent a right-sided parietooccipital craniotomy and substitution of two 1-cm pieces of dura mater by two different grafts: one piece of biosynthetic cellulose (50 mu thick) and one fragment of temporal fascia. The animals were observed for 30, 90, or 180 days. Group II animals (five dogs) underwent a somewhat larger craniotomy, removal of a 2-cm piece of dura mater, and lesioning of the cortex made by a thin sharp forceps, which caused bleeding that was controlled by application of a thin film of cellulose (10 mu thick). Duraplasty was performed using a 50-mu-thick cellulose membrane to complete the procedure and the animals were observed over a period of 270 days. Group III animals (six dogs) underwent smaller (1-cm diameter) bilateral parietal craniectomy, which included additional covering of the dura on the left side with 50-mu-thick cellulose and a suture of temporalis muscle. This group was observed for 40, 60, 80, or 120 days. Transient mild clinical symptoms were observed during the early postoperative period. At autopsy, macroscopic examination demonstrated good acceptance of the grafts with few and moderate extradural fibrosis, which caused adherence of the implants to the bone fragment. No adherence to the cortex was observed. Microscopic examination demonstrated absence of graft adherence to the cortical surface even when the cortex was injured. The cellulose was enveloped by two layers of connective tissue, the external layer being thicker than the internal one. Cellulose fibers increased in thickness over time until 30 days and then decreased in thickness until 270 days. This decrease in thickness between 30 to 270 days was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The physical properties of biosynthetic cellulose and the low cellular reaction to its implantation qualify this material as a dural substitute. Additional long-term studies must be undertaken to complete this report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8988093     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  13 in total

1.  Biocompatible bacterial cellulose membrane in dural defect repair of rat.

Authors:  Frederico de Melo Tavares de Lima; Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto; Belmira Lara da Silveira Andrade-da-Costa; Jaiurte Gomes Martins da Silva; Olávio Campos Júnior; José Lamartine de Andrade Aguiar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Experimental evaluation of new chitin-chitosan graft for duraplasty.

Authors:  M Pogorielov; A Kravtsova; G C Reilly; V Deineka; G Tetteh; O Kalinkevich; O Pogorielova; R Moskalenko; G Tkach
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Autologous tissues for dural grafting in children: a report of 56 cases.

Authors:  Juan F Martínez-Lage; Miguel A Pérez-Espejo; Joaquín Hernández Palazón; Francisco López Hernández; Pablo Puerta
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  The feasibility of using irreversible electroporation to introduce pores in bacterial cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Adwoa Baah-Dwomoh; Andrea Rolong; Paul Gatenholm; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A new graft material for myringoplasty: bacterial cellulose.

Authors:  Sultan Biskin; Murat Damar; Sema Nur Oktem; Erdal Sakalli; Duygu Erdem; Onur Pakir
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for bone regeneration.

Authors:  S Saska; H S Barud; A M M Gaspar; R Marchetto; S J L Ribeiro; Y Messaddeq
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2011-09-27

7.  Clinical experience with a novel bovine collagen dura mater substitute.

Authors:  Bruno Silva Costa; George de Albuquerque Cavalcanti-Mendes; Marcelo Sartori de Abreu; Atos Alves de Sousa
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-07

8.  Fetoscopic repair of spina bifida: safer and better?

Authors:  D A L Pedreira; E A Reece; R H Chmait; E V Kontopoulos; R A Quintero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Preparation and Characterization of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Treated by Electron Beam Irradiation for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sung-Jun An; So-Hyoun Lee; Jung-Bo Huh; Sung In Jeong; Jong-Seok Park; Hui-Jeong Gwon; Eun-Sook Kang; Chang-Mo Jeong; Youn-Mook Lim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  In vivo and in vitro evaluation of an Acetobacter xylinum synthesized microbial cellulose membrane intended for guided tissue repair.

Authors:  Péricles Nóbrega Mendes; Sheila Canevese Rahal; Oduvaldo Câmara Marques Pereira-Junior; Viciany Erique Fabris; Sara Lais Rahal Lenharo; João Ferreira de Lima-Neto; Fernanda da Cruz Landim-Alvarenga
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.