Literature DB >> 26956980

A new graft material for myringoplasty: bacterial cellulose.

Sultan Biskin1, Murat Damar1, Sema Nur Oktem2, Erdal Sakalli3,4, Duygu Erdem1, Onur Pakir1.   

Abstract

We aimed to determine the success rate of bacterial cellulose (BC) myringoplasty in tympanic membrane (TM) perforation. We reviewed the clinical records of 12 patients (16 ears) who underwent BC myringoplasty for long-standing TM perforations (>6 months) between March 2012 and January 2015. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 12.8 (range 6-24) months. In all patients, the perforation involved less than 50 % of the tympanic membrane, and the air-bone gap was ≤30 dB on the operative side. The age, gender, preoperative air average, bone average, air-bone gap, perforation size and location, and postoperative TM microscopic examinations of the patients were recorded. Following the BC myringoplasty, complete coverage of the perforation occurred in the first 6 months in 13 of 16 ears (81.3 %), although retraction occurred in two of these ears within 6 months. In three ears (18.8 %), the perforation persisted during the first postoperative month. The pre- and postoperative average air threshold was 19.56 (range 7-75) and 15.69 (range 5-75) dB, respectively. The pre- and postoperative average air-bone gap was 9.25 (range 0-25) and 5.63 (0-25) dB, respectively. Both the air threshold and air-bone gap improved postoperatively (both p = 0.008). No complications such as infection and granulation tissue formation were detected in any patient. BC is a safe graft material that is inexpensive, easy-to-use, and provides a high success rate in small tympanic membrane perforations. However, further studies of large tympanic membrane perforations with more samples and long-term follow-up are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial cellulose; Myringoplasty; Perforation; Tympanic membrane

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956980     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-3959-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  Tympanic membrane repair with a dermal allograft.

Authors:  D W Laidlaw; P D Costantino; S Govindaraj; D H Hiltzik; P J Catalano
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 2.  Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials.

Authors:  Dieter Klemm; Friederike Kramer; Sebastian Moritz; Tom Lindström; Mikael Ankerfors; Derek Gray; Annie Dorris
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: an experimental study.

Authors:  L R Mello; L T Feltrin; P T Fontes Neto; F A Ferraz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 4.  Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material.

Authors:  Nasrullah Shah; Mazhar Ul-Islam; Waleed Ahmad Khattak; Joong Kon Park
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.381

5.  In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose.

Authors:  Gisela Helenius; Henrik Bäckdahl; Aase Bodin; Ulf Nannmark; Paul Gatenholm; Bo Risberg
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 6.  [Tympanic membrane reconstruction with non-autogenous transplants and alloplastic materials].

Authors:  H Kaftan
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 1.057

7.  Tissue biocompatibility of cellulose and its derivatives.

Authors:  T Miyamoto; S Takahashi; H Ito; H Inagaki; Y Noishiki
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1989-01

8.  Determinants of spontaneous healing in traumatic perforations of the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  F T Orji; C C Agu
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.597

9.  Basic fibroblast growth factor combined with atelocollagen for closing chronic tympanic membrane perforations in 87 patients.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hakuba; Michitaka Iwanaga; Shinzo Tanaka; Yasuyuki Hiratsuka; Yohei Kumabe; Masaya Konishi; Yusuke Okanoue; Nao Hiwatashi; Tadahiko Wada
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Bacterial cellulose nanofibrillar patch as a wound healing platform of tympanic membrane perforation.

Authors:  Jangho Kim; Seung Won Kim; Subeom Park; Ki Taek Lim; Hoon Seonwoo; Yeonju Kim; Byung Hee Hong; Yun-Hoon Choung; Jong Hoon Chung
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 9.933

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus butterfly inlay autografts.

Authors:  Zhufang Jiang; Zihan Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A better design is needed for clinical studies of chronic tympanic membrane perforations using biological materials.

Authors:  Zheng-Cai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Effect of hyaluronic acid with or without scaffold material on the regeneration of tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Zheng-Cai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Reply to the letter to the editor ''in response to: a better design is needed for clinical studies of chronic tympanic membrane perforations using biological materials'' 10.1007/s00405-016-4019-0.

Authors:  Sultan Bişkin; Duygu Erdem; Erdal Sakallı
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose as a Carrier of BMP-2 for Bone Regeneration in a Rabbit Frontal Sinus Model.

Authors:  Takashi Koike; Jingjing Sha; Yunpeng Bai; Yuhei Matsuda; Katsumi Hideshima; Takaya Yamada; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Opportunities of Bacterial Cellulose to Treat Epithelial Tissues.

Authors:  Irene Anton-Sales; Uwe Beekmann; Anna Laromaine; Anna Roig; Dana Kralisch
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.465

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.