Literature DB >> 8987953

Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version.

J G Mauldin1, P D Mauldin, T I Feng, E K Adams, V L Durkalski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine predictors of successful external cephalic version and to calculate the associated cost savings achieved with success. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of 203 women with singleton gestations who underwent external cephalic version was performed. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed on patient-specific risk data to predict successful version. National claims data were used for the cost simulation.
RESULTS: Higher parity (p = 0.02), transverse-oblique presentation (p = 0.001), posterior placenta (p = 0.001), and a longer duration of pregnancy (p = 0.001) significantly increased the likelihood of a successful version. Heavier maternal weight was negatively associated with successful version (p = 0.05). The cost simulation revealed an average savings of $2462 for each successful version.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies clinical variables associated with an increased external cephalic version success rate. If, in fact, successful external cephalic version reduces both maternal and fetal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and, as demonstrated in this analysis, the costs associated with the delivery, then greater effort should be made to maximize the success rate of external cephalic version.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8987953     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70118-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital.

Authors:  M James; K Hunt; R Burr; R Johanson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population.

Authors:  E K Adams; P D Mauldin; J G Mauldin; R M Mayberry
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-06

3.  A Simulation Model for External Cephalic Version.

Authors:  Carla Baaklini; Natalie Menassa; Jalen T Larios; Derek A Ballas
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-30

4.  Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Tan; Alex Macario; Brendan Carvalho; Maurice L Druzin; Yasser Y El-Sayed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Central neuraxial blockade-assisted external cephalic version in reducing caesarean section rate: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bolaji; Lillian Alabi-Isama
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-12-23

6.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials of Neuraxial, Intravenous, and Inhalational Anesthesia for External Cephalic Version.

Authors:  Qingzhong Hao; Yirui Hu; Li Zhang; John Ross; Sarah Robishaw; Christine Noble; Xianren Wu; Xiaopeng Zhang
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.627

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.