Literature DB >> 8987463

Intellectual property issues in genomics.

R S Eisenberg1.   

Abstract

Controversy over intellectual property rights in the results of large-scale cDNA sequencing raises intriguing questions about the roles of the public and private sectors in genomics research, and about who stands to benefit (and who stands to lose) from the private appropriation of genomic information. While the US Patent and Trademark Office has rejected patent applications on cDNA fragments of unknown function from the National Institutes of Health, private firms have pursued three distinct strategies for exploiting unpatented cDNA sequence information: exclusive licensing, non-exclusive licensing and dedication to the public domain.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8987463     DOI: 10.1016/0167-7799(96)10040-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN: 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  6 in total

1.  Patents and innovation in cancer therapeutics: lessons from CellPro.

Authors:  Avital Bar-Shalom; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.

Authors:  Kathryn Maxson Jones; Rachel A Ankeny; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.326

Review 3.  Patents in genomics and human genetics.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Christopher Heaney
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 4.  Sharing Data to Build a Medical Information Commons: From Bermuda to the Global Alliance.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Rachel A Ankeny; Kathryn Maxson Jones
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  A view from the dark side.

Authors:  David B Searls
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Biological diversity in the patent system.

Authors:  Paul Oldham; Stephen Hall; Oscar Forero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.