Literature DB >> 12532643

Patents and innovation in cancer therapeutics: lessons from CellPro.

Avital Bar-Shalom1, Robert Cook-Deegan.   

Abstract

This article discusses the interaction between intellectual property and cancer treatment. CellPro developed a stem cell separation technology based on research at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. A patent with broad claims to bone marrow stem cell antibodies had been awarded to Johns Hopkins University and licensed to Baxter Healthcare under the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act to promote commercial use of inventions from federally funded research. CellPro got FDA approval more than two years before Baxter but lost patent infringement litigation. NIH elected not to compel Hopkins to license its patents to CellPro. CellPro went out of business, selling its technology to its competitor. Decisions at both firms and university licensing offices, and policies at the Patent and Trademark Office, NIH, and the courts influenced the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12532643      PMCID: PMC2690134          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  7 in total

1.  How a corporate feud doomed human trials of promising therapy.

Authors:  Bill Richards
Journal:  Wall St J (East Ed)       Date:  1999-08-06

2.  Public-private interaction in pharmaceutical research.

Authors:  I Cockburn; R Henderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Intellectual property issues in genomics.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 4.  Structure and function in gene patenting.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Acute myelogenous leukemia: a human cell line responsive to colony-stimulating activity.

Authors:  H P Koeffler; D W Golde
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research.

Authors:  M A Heller; R S Eisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Monoclonal antibody 12-8 recognizes a 115-kd molecule present on both unipotent and multipotent hematopoietic colony-forming cells and their precursors.

Authors:  R G Andrews; J W Singer; I D Bernstein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 22.113

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Do March-In Rights Ensure Access to Medical Products Arising From Federally Funded Research? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Carolyn L Treasure; Jerry Avorn; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  What are gene patents and why are people worried about them?

Authors:  Jon F Merz; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

Review 3.  In Vitro Cancer Models: A Closer Look at Limitations on Translation.

Authors:  Nina Antunes; Banani Kundu; Subhas C Kundu; Rui L Reis; Vítor Correlo
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Is Bayh-Dole good for developing countries? Lessons from the US experience.

Authors:  Anthony D So; Bhaven N Sampat; Arti K Rai; Robert Cook-Deegan; Jerome H Reichman; Robert Weissman; Amy Kapczynski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Clinicians' contributions to the development of coronary artery stents: a qualitative study of transformative device innovation.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Shuai Xu; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.