Literature DB >> 8986574

Average and peak contact stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties.

J A Szivek1, P L Anderson, J B Benjamin.   

Abstract

Seven total knee arthroplasty systems were tested to determine contact stress patterns and contact areas using a calibrated Fuji film stress analysis technique. Knees were loaded to 2,000 N (204 kg) at 15 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees flexion at 24 and 37 degrees C. Evaluation of stresses at 37 degrees C at 15 degrees and 60 degrees using an average contact stress assessment technique indicated that the LCS meniscal bearing knee system, (DePuy, Warsaw, IN), the AMK knee with a constrained insert (DePuy), and the PFC knee with a posterior-lipped insert (Johnson and Johnson, Raynham, MA) had the lowest average contact stresses (near or below 10 MPa). The PFC with a regular insert (Johnson and Johnson) the Ortholoc II (Dow Corning Wright, Arlington, TN), and the AMK with a regular insert (DePuy) had intermediate contact stresses. The AMK with a Hylamer-M insert (DePuy) and the MG II (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) had the highest average contact stresses (near or above 20 MPa). A stress-calibrated Fuji film measurement technique has shown that an assessment of ranges of contact stress provides much more information about regions of expected wear than an assessment of average contact stresses. Testing of the tibiofemoral articulation of artificial knees revealed that all knees had some areas of contact with maximum stresses in excess of 15 MPa. As the yield strength of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene is approximately 15 MPa, all tibial inserts could wear to some extent. Peak contact stresses at four test angles of the AMK, Series 7000 (Osteonics, Allendale, NJ:) Genesis (Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics, Memphis, TN), and MG II patellofemoral articulations were high (above 30 MPa). Contact areas varied from line-shaped to bilateral circular or elliptical shapes. The LCS knee system experienced substantially lower patellofemoral contact stresses and larger contact areas. Changes in conformity of knee designs are warranted to overcome wear problems. Peak contact stresses measured from the LCS meniscal bearing tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint were in excess of 30 MPa in some areas at low flexion angles. This design does create large areas of contact at very low contact pressures, however, and for this reason is expected to wear less than other designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8986574     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80137-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  An instrumented scaffold can monitor loading in the knee joint.

Authors:  J A Szivek; C L Bliss; C P Geffre; D S Margolis; D W DeYoung; J T Ruth; A B Schnepp; B C Tellis; R K Vaidyanathan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  Tibiofemoral contact areas and pressures in six high flexion knees.

Authors:  Kei Shiramizu; Frank Vizesi; Warwick Bruce; Sebastian Herrmann; William R Walsh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The 2011 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: 'Lab'-in-a-knee: in vivo knee forces, kinematics, and contact analysis.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Shantanu Patil; Nicolai Steklov; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Increased patellofemoral pressure after TKA: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ulf G Leichtle; Markus Wünschel; Carmen I Leichtle; Otto Müller; Philipp Kohler; Nikolaus Wülker; Andrea Lorenz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus preservation in high flexion total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Du Hyun Ro; Yool Cho; Young Min Lee; Kee Yun Chung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Designing prosthetic knee joints with bio-inspired bearing surfaces.

Authors:  Mingfeng Qiu; Anthony Chyr; Anthony P Sanders; Bart Raeymaekers
Journal:  Tribol Int       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Influence of Different Patellofemoral Design Variations Based on Genesis II Total Knee Endoprosthesis on Patellofemoral Pressure and Kinematics.

Authors:  Ulf G Leichtle; Barbara Lange; Yvonne Herzog; Peter Schnauffer; Carmen I Leichtle; Nikolaus Wülker; Andrea Lorenz
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Comparison of the contact stress between the sensor and real polyethylene insert in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

9.  The Biomechanical Effect of Loading Speed on Metal-on-UHMWPE Contact Mechanics.

Authors:  Radovan Zdero; Zahra S Bagheri; Mojtaba Rezaey; Emil H Schemitsch; Habiba Bougherara
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2014-05-16

10.  Biomechanical Measurement Error Can Be Caused by Fujifilm Thickness: A Theoretical, Experimental, and Computational Analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Sarwar; Simli Srivastava; Chris Chu; Alan Machin; Emil H Schemitsch; Habiba Bougherara; Zahra S Bagheri; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.