Literature DB >> 8985883

Mechanical response characteristics of the hearing organ in the low-frequency regions of the cochlea.

M Ulfendahl1, S M Khanna, A Fridberger, A Flock, B Flock, W Jäger.   

Abstract

1. With the use of an in vitro preparation of the guinea pig temporal bone, in which the apical turns of the cochlea are exposed, the mechanical and electrical responses of the cochlea in the low-frequency regions were studied during sound stimulation. 2. The mechanical characteristics were investigated in the fourth and third turns of the cochlea with the use of laser heterodyne interferometry, which allows the vibratory responses of both sensory and supporting cells to be recorded. The electrical responses, which can be maintained for several hours, were recorded only in the most apical turn. 3. In the most apical turn, the frequency locations and shapes of the mechanical and electrical responses were very similar. 4. The shapes of the tuning curves and the spatial locations of the frequency maxima in the temporal bone preparation compared very favorably with published results from in vivo recordings of hair cell receptor potentials and sound-induced vibrations of the Reissner's membrane. 5. Compressive nonlinearities were present in both the mechanical and the electrical responses at moderate sound pressure levels. 6. The mechanical tuning changed along the length of the cochlea, the center frequencies in the fourth and third turns being approximately 280 and 570 Hz, respectively. 7. The mechanical responses of sensory and supporting cells were almost identical in shape but differed significantly in amplitude radially across the reticular lamina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8985883     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Three-dimensional motion of the organ of Corti.

Authors:  W Hemmert; H P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Measuring hearing organ vibration patterns with confocal microscopy and optical flow.

Authors:  Anders Fridberger; Jerker Widengren; Jacques Boutet de Monvel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  More whistles and bells for fly hearing.

Authors:  Richard G Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Imaging hair cell transduction at the speed of sound: dynamic behavior of mammalian stereocilia.

Authors:  Anders Fridberger; Igor Tomo; Mats Ulfendahl; Jacques Boutet de Monvel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nanomechanics of the subtectorial space caused by electromechanics of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  Manuela Nowotny; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sound-evoked radial strain in the hearing organ.

Authors:  Igor Tomo; Jacques Boutet de Monvel; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Acoustic overstimulation increases outer hair cell Ca2+ concentrations and causes dynamic contractions of the hearing organ.

Authors:  A Fridberger; A Flock; M Ulfendahl; B Flock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of salicylate on sound-evoked outer hair cell stereocilia deflections.

Authors:  Pierre Hakizimana; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  Change in cochlear response in an animal model of otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Chenkai Dai; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.