Literature DB >> 8985866

Representation of frequency in the primary auditory field of the barn owl forebrain.

Y E Cohen1, E I Knudsen.   

Abstract

1. The primary auditory field (PAF) constitutes the first telencephalic stage of auditory information processing in the classical auditory pathway. In this study we investigated the frequency representation in the PAF of the barn owl, a species with a broad frequency range of hearing and a highly advanced auditory system. 2. Single- and multiunit sites were recorded extracellularly in ketamine-anesthetized owls. The frequency response properties of PAF sites were assessed with the use of digitally synthesized dichotic stimuli. PAF sites (n = 442) either were unresponsive to tonal stimulation (but responsive to noise stimuli), were tuned for frequency, or had multipeaked frequency response profiles. Tuned sites responded best to frequencies between 0.2 and 8.8 kHz, a range that encompasses nearly the entire hearing range of the barn owl. Most sites responding best to frequencies < 4 kHz had relatively broad frequency tuning, whereas sites responding best to higher frequencies had either broad or narrow frequency tuning. Sites with multipeaked frequency response profiles typically had two response peaks. The first peak was usually between 1 and 3 kHz and the second was usually between 5 and 8 kHz; there was no systematic relationship between the two peak frequencies. 3. In dorsoventral electrode penetrations that contained sites with tuned and/or multipeaked response profiles, a "common frequency" was identified that elicited a maximal response from all of the sites in the penetration. 4. The PAF contains a single tonotopic field. Units tuned to low frequencies are located caudomedially, whereas units tuned to high frequencies are located rostrolaterally. Compared with the frequency representation along the basilar papilla and in other auditory structures, the PAF overrepresents low frequencies (< 4 kHz) that are important for barn owl vocalizations. Conversely, high frequencies (> or = 4 kHz), which are necessary for precise sound localization, are underrepresented relative to these more peripheral auditory structures. 5. There was considerable interindividual variability both in the relative magnification of different frequency ranges and in the orientation of the tonotopic map in the brain. 6. These results suggest that the barn owl PAF, like the mammalian primary auditory cortex, is a general processor of auditory information that is involved in the analysis of both the meaning (such as species-specific vocalizations) and the location of auditory stimuli. In addition, the high degree of interindividual variability in the representation of frequency information suggests that the barn owl PAF, like the mammalian auditory cortex, is subject to modification by sensory experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8985866     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Auditory responses in the cochlear nucleus of awake mustached bats: precursors to spectral integration in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Robert A Marsh; Kiran Nataraj; Donald Gans; Christine V Portfors; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Adaptive plasticity in the auditory thalamus of juvenile barn owls.

Authors:  Greg L Miller; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Learned birdsong and the neurobiology of human language.

Authors:  Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Mapping the tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex with minimally salient acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Distinct Correlation Structure Supporting a Rate-Code for Sound Localization in the Owl's Auditory Forebrain.

Authors:  Michael V Beckert; Rodrigo Pavão; José L Peña
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.