Literature DB >> 8985028

Prognostic factors for acute and late skin reactions in radiotherapy patients.

I Turesson1, J Nyman, E Holmberg, A Odén.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients treated with identical radiotherapy schedules show a substantial variation in the degree of acute and late normal tissue reactions. To identify any possible contributing factors to this phenomenon, we have analyzed the treatments of 402 breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The patients received adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy between 1972 and 1985 and have been followed up since then. Multivariate analyses were performed with peak reflectance erythema and peak acute reaction score as endpoints for the acute reactions, and with progression rate of telangiectasia as well as telangiectasia score as endpoints for the late reactions. Twenty patient- and treatment-related factors were tested such as age, menopausal status, hemoglobin level, serum calcium, smoking habits, hypothyroidism, diabetes, hypertension, blood pressure, cardiovascular and autoimmune disease, the influence of hormone therapy and chemotherapy, pretreatment reflectance value, acute skin reactions, radiation quality, individual dose, bilateral fields, and the total effect (TE) for the dose schedule applied.
RESULTS: The TE was a strong prognostic factor for all endpoints. In addition to TE, blood pressure was prognostic for the peak erythema measured by reflectance spectrophotometry, and the pretreatment reflectance value was prognostic for the acute score. The only independent prognostic factors found for the progression of skin telangiectasia and telangiectasia score except for TE were the individual dose and the acute skin reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: These factors explained at most about 30% of the variance describing the total patient-to-patient variability for each endpoint. The remaining variability is still unexplained but may be related to individual differences in cellular radiosensitivity, partly determined by genetic variations and partly by unknown epigenetic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8985028     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00426-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  51 in total

1.  Radiation pharmacogenomics: a genome-wide association approach to identify radiation response biomarkers using human lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  Nifang Niu; Yuxin Qin; Brooke L Fridley; Junmei Hou; Krishna R Kalari; Minjia Zhu; Tse-Yu Wu; Gregory D Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Liewei Wang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity. Part II: implications for clinical practice and radiation protection.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Effect of irradiation on the expression of DNA repair genes studied in human fibroblasts by real-time qPCR using three methods of reference gene validation.

Authors:  Sebastian Reuther; Martina Reiter; Annette Raabe; Ekkehard Dikomey
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  After the bomb drops: a new look at radiation-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).

Authors:  Jacqueline P Williams; William H McBride
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 5.  Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Maud H W Starmans; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Georgi Nalbantov; Hugo J W L Aerts; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Paul C Boutros; Pierluigi Granone; Vincenzo Valentini; Adrian C Begg; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Deoxyribonucleic acid damage-associated biomarkers of ionising radiation: current status and future relevance for radiology and radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Manning; K Rothkamm
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Correlation between anthropometric parameters and acute skin toxicity in breast cancer radiotherapy patients: a pilot assessment study.

Authors:  Benoîte Méry; Alexis Vallard; Jane-Chloé Trone; Cécile Pacaut; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Sophie Espenel; Julien Langrand-Escure; Edouard Ollier; Guoping Wang; Peng Diao; Lise Bigot; Sylvie Mengue Ndong; Claire Bosacki; Majed Ben Mrad; Nicolas Magné
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity Part I: cell signalling in radiation response.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Comparison of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy boost in breast-conserving therapy: Patient-reported outcome measures and aesthetic outcome.

Authors:  I Kindts; A Laenen; M Christiaens; H Janssen; E Van Limbergen; C Weltens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Radiation induced apoptosis and initial DNA damage are inversely related in locally advanced breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Beatriz Pinar; Luis Alberto Henríquez-Hernández; Pedro C Lara; Elisa Bordon; Carlos Rodriguez-Gallego; Marta Lloret; Maria Isabel Nuñez; Mariano Ruiz De Almodovar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.