Literature DB >> 8984133

Comparison of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with essential hypertension.

I Tikkanen1, P Omvik, H A Jensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the blood pressure lowering efficacy as well as tolerability and safety of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan compared with that of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel study. Patients (n = 407) with diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 and < or = 120 mmHg at the end of a 2-week baseline placebo period were randomly allocated to receive either 50 mg losartan once a day or 20 mg enalapril once a day for 12 weeks. Blood pressure, clinical and laboratory safety, specific symptoms including coughing determined using a symptoms questionnaire and metabolic variables were examined at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12.
RESULTS: Both losartan and enalapril decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline at weeks 6 and 12. Blood pressure changes from baseline at trough (22-26 h after the dose) did not differ between the two groups in the per-protocol analysis. Response to treatment at trough was excellent or good (diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mmHg) in 51 and 53% of the patients in the losartan and enalapril groups, respectively. Enalapril administration increased dry coughing symptoms whereas losartan did not. The incidence of dry coughing was 1.0 and 12.2% as a spontaneously reported discomfort at week 12 and 3.0 and 15.1% as a clinical adverse experience in the losartan and enalapril groups, respectively. The difference from baseline at week 12 in the incidence of dry coughing between the two groups was 14.9% as a specific symptom in the symptoms questionnaire. Losartan reduced serum uric acid concentration, whereas effects on other metabolic parameters did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Losartan is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug showing similar blood-pressure-lowering efficacy to that of enalapril at trough. However, in contrast to enalapril, losartan does not increase the incidence of dry coughing. Thus, the angiotensin II antagonist losartan provides a promising new approach to treatment of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8984133     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199511000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  18 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of angiotensin receptor blockade in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Chantal Csajka; Thierry Buclin; Karin Fattinger; Hans R Brunner; Jérôme Biollaz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of losartan potassium in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  L M Burrell
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Effects of low-dose losartan treatment on persistent microalbuminuria in normotensive type 1 diabetic subjects.

Authors:  O Açbay
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Therapeutic trials comparing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Authors:  W J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Spectrum of use for the angiotensin-receptor blocking drugs.

Authors:  M E Fabiani; C I Johnston
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Losartan potassium: a review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  K L Goa; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Race, obesity, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: treatment response in children with primary hypertension.

Authors:  Andrew M South; Lester Arguelles; Gal Finer; Craig B Langman
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  Drug treatment of hypertension complicating diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M J MacLeod; J McLay
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  [The renin-angiotensin system in cardiovascular diseases].

Authors:  C Unterberg; H Kreuzer; A B Buchwald
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.