Literature DB >> 11888333

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of angiotensin receptor blockade in healthy volunteers.

Chantal Csajka1, Thierry Buclin, Karin Fattinger, Hans R Brunner, Jérôme Biollaz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of angiotensin II receptor antagonists as a therapeutic class.
DESIGN: Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling study.
METHODS: The data of 14 phase I studies with 10 different drugs were analysed. A common population pharmacokinetic model (two compartments, mixed zero- and first-order absorption, two metabolite compartments) was applied to the 2685 drug and 900 metabolite concentration measurements. A standard nonlinear mixed effect modelling approach was used to estimate the drug-specific parameters and their variabilities. Similarly, a pharmacodynamic model was applied to the 7360 effect measurements, i.e. the decrease of peak blood pressure response to intravenous angiotensin challenge recorded by finger photoplethysmography. The concentration of drug and metabolite in an effect compartment was assumed to translate into receptor blockade [maximum effect (Emax) model with first-order link].
RESULTS: A general pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model for angiotensin antagonism in healthy individuals was successfully built up for the 10 drugs studied. Representatives of this class share different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Their effects on blood pressure are dose-dependent, but the time course of the effect varies between the drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: The characterisation of PK-PD relationships for these drugs gives the opportunity to optimise therapeutic regimens and to suggest dosage adjustments in specific conditions. Such a model can be used to further refine the use of this class of drugs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11888333     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200241020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  46 in total

1.  Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of once daily losartan potassium compared with captopril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Authors:  J M Mallion; D C Bradstreet; L Makris; A I Goldberg; S Halasz; C S Sweet; N Y Lim; O Madonna
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1995-07

2.  Angiotensin II antagonism improves the lipoprotein profile in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  D de Zeeuw; R T Gansevoort; R P Dullaart; P E de Jong
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1995-07

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

Authors:  C Csajka; T Buclin; H R Brunner; J Biollaz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Continuous, real-time, noninvasive monitor of blood pressure: Penaz methodology applied to the finger.

Authors:  R D Boehmer
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-10

5.  Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy and safety compared to hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  G Hegner; G Faust; F Freytag; S Meilenbrock; J Sullivan; F Bodin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension.

Authors:  Z H Israili
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 7.  Angiotensin II receptor antagonists: an emerging new class of cardiovascular therapeutics.

Authors:  P B Timmermans
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 8.  Angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

Authors:  M Burnier; H R Brunner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Losartan in heart failure. Hemodynamic effects and tolerability. Losartan Hemodynamic Study Group.

Authors:  I Crozier; H Ikram; N Awan; J Cleland; N Stephen; K Dickstein; M Frey; J Young; G Klinger; L Makris
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Effects of losartan on a background of hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  B A Soffer; J T Wright; J H Pratt; B Wiens; A I Goldberg; C S Sweet
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  8 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of fimasartan applied to predict the influence of a high fat diet on its blood pressure-lowering effect in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Jongtae Lee; Seunghoon Han; Sangil Jeon; Taegon Hong; Dong-Seok Yim
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of olmesartan following oral administration of its prodrug, olmesartan medoxomil: in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Kazutaka Yoshihara; Yuying Gao; Hiroshi Shiga; D Russell Wada; Masafumi Hisaoka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Intermittent drug dosing intervals guided by the operational multiple dosing half lives for predictable plasma accumulation and fluctuation.

Authors:  Anita Grover; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Angiotensin II type 1 receptor 1166A/C polymorphism in association with blood pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II.

Authors:  Hyeong-Seok Lim; Joo-Youn Cho; Dal-Seok Oh; Jae-Yong Chung; Kyoung-Sup Hong; Kyun-Seop Bae; Kyung-Sang Yu; Kyung-Hoon Lee; In-Jin Jang; Sang-Goo Shin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Olmesartan, the Active Metabolite of Olmesartan Medoxomil, in Patients with Hypertension.

Authors:  Devender Kodati; Harish Kaushik Kotakonda; Narsimhareddy Yellu
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.441

6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antihypertensive effect of eprosartan in Black and White hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Petra C van Rijn-Bikker; Oliver Ackaert; Nelleke Snelder; Reinier M van Hest; Bart A Ploeger; Richard P Koopmans; Ron A A Mathôt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans.

Authors:  Theodore W Kurtz; Takashi Kajiya
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-02-28

8.  Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions between cilnidipine and valsartan, in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jieon Lee; Howard Lee; Kyungho Jang; Kyoung Soo Lim; Dongseong Shin; Kyung-Sang Yu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.162

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.