Literature DB >> 8983624

Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer.

D A Stell1, C R Carter, I Stewart, J R Anderson.   

Abstract

A total of 103 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was assessed for intra-abdominal spread of malignancy using ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) and laparoscopy under general anaesthesia. Histologically proven metastases were to the liver in 27 patients, lymph nodes in 49 and directly to peritoneum in 13. All modalities showed a high specificity (92-100 per cent) for each type of metastasis. Laparoscopy was more sensitive in detecting hepatic, nodal and peritoneal metastases; the relative performance of laparoscopy was best with regard to hepatic metastases. Ultrasonography and CT were particularly poor at detecting nodal and peritoneal metastases. There was no significant morbidity and no mortality associated with laparoscopy, which was more accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer than ultrasonography or CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8983624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  30 in total

1.  Laparoscopic staging of gastric cancer is safe and affects treatment strategy.

Authors:  P McCulloch; M Johnson; R Jairam; W Fischer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Diagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits.

Authors:  Beate Rau; Michael Hünerbein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Indications for staging laparoscopy in clinical T4M0 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhito Tsuchida; Takaki Yoshikawa; Akira Tsuburaya; Haruhiko Cho; Osamu Kobayashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Modern imaging techniques for preoperative detection of distant metastases in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Y T Lee; E K W Ng; L C T Hung; S C S Chung; J Y L Ching; W Y Chan; W C Chu; J J Sung
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Clinical significance of CT-defined minimal ascites in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dong Kyung Chang; Ji Won Kim; Byung Kwan Kim; Kook Lae Lee; Chi Sung Song; Joon Koo Han; In Sung Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Computed tomographic characteristics for patients with unresectable gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Jhe-Cyuan Guo; Chin-Chen Chang; Chung-Yi Yang; Bin-Chi Liao; Jau-Yu Liau; Chin-Hao Chang; Kun-Huei Yeh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 10.  The role of staging laparoscopy for intraabdominal cancers: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  L Chang; D Stefanidis; W S Richardson; D B Earle; R D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.