Literature DB >> 28726044

Computed tomographic characteristics for patients with unresectable gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Jhe-Cyuan Guo1,2,3, Chin-Chen Chang4, Chung-Yi Yang4,5,6, Bin-Chi Liao1,2,3, Jau-Yu Liau7,8, Chin-Hao Chang9, Kun-Huei Yeh10,11,12.   

Abstract

Although current staging workups could differentiate most patients with operable from inoperable advanced gastric cancers, there are still some patients with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis, defined as only metastasis with multiple subcentimeter lesions in peritoneum, receiving unnecessary open-close procedures. The computed tomography (CT) of the patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis was retrospectively identified and then thoroughly reviewed by two independent radiologists unaware of the peritoneal carcinomatosis status. Of the 798 patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer between January 2007 and December 2010, 52 patients harboring advanced gastric cancer with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis receiving surgery with curative intent were identified. Descriptive statistic was used for the radiologic characteristics. The most common radiologic characteristic of CT was omental fat stranding (57.7%), followed by omental clustered subcentimeter nodules (53.8%), distant enlarged lymph node (40.4%), distant grouping of small lymph nodes (36.5%), peritoneal nodules or thickening (34.6%), minimal loculated ascites (21.2%), intestinal wall thickening or irregularity (9.6%), and hydronephrosis or hydroureter without stone or urothelial lesion (5.8%). Comprehensively reviewing the radiologic characteristics of CT may identify the patients harboring advanced gastric cancer with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced gastric cancer; Computed tomography; Peritoneal carcinomatosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28726044     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1004-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  22 in total

1.  Clinical significance of CT-defined minimal ascites in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dong Kyung Chang; Ji Won Kim; Byung Kwan Kim; Kook Lae Lee; Chi Sung Song; Joon Koo Han; In Sung Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases.

Authors:  F D'Elia; A Zingarelli; D Palli; M Grani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging.

Authors:  J Davies; A G Chalmers; H M Sue-Ling; J May; G V Miller; I G Martin; D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer.

Authors:  D A Stell; C R Carter; I Stewart; J R Anderson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Diagnostic laparoscopy, serum CA125, and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Fujimura; S Kinami; I Ninomiya; H Kitagawa; S Fushida; G Nishimura; M Kayahara; K Shimizu; T Ohta; K Miwa
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Peritoneal metastasis: detection with 16- or 64-detector row CT in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Su Jin Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Sun Hwi Hwang; Hye Seung Lee; Do Joong Park; So Yeon Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Should gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis be treated surgically?

Authors:  Takaki Yoshikawa; Masahiro Kanari; Akira Tsuburaya; Osamu Kobayashi; Motonori Sairenji; Hisahiko Motohashi; Yoshikazu Noguchi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

8.  Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  P Jacquet; J S Jelinek; M A Steves; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  CT manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  M M Walkey; A C Friedman; P Sohotra; P D Radecki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Value of computed tomography in addition to ultrasound for preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Authors:  C Kayaalp; K Arda; T Orug; N Ozcay
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.424

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gastric adenocarcinoma peritoneal carcinomatosis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Benjamin L Green; Jeremy L Davis
Journal:  Dig Med Res       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Spectral CT in peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: a tool for differential diagnosis of small nodules?

Authors:  Giada Zorzetto; Andrea Coppola; Valeria Molinelli; Maria Gloria Angeretti; Jvan Casarin; Federico Fontana; Filippo Piacentino; Giulio Carcano; Fabio Ghezzi; Massimo Venturini
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-10-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.