Literature DB >> 8982524

Variability in patient experiences at 15 New York City hospitals.

L Rogut1, L S Newman, P D Cleary.   

Abstract

To examine how patient experiences of the interpersonal aspects of quality of care varied among a group of 15 New York City hospitals, and the extent to which hospital and patient characteristics explained interhospital variability, a telephone survey was conducted with 3,423 randomly selected patients discharged from 15 New York City hospitals. Bivariate analysis, multiple linear regression, and least square means were used to assess the effects of 5 hospital characteristics and 15 patient characteristics on reports about problems with care. Outcome measures included patients' reported problems with selected aspects of care, patients' ratings of care, and patients' willingness to recommend the hospitals from which they had been discharged. The 15 hospitals varied widely in the rates at which patients reported problems with their care (10.7-21.7, mean = 14.8, p < 0.001). A multivariate model showed that patients in fair or poor health, those without a regular doctor, younger patients, and minorities other than black and Hispanic were more likely to report problems with aspects of their care. Medicaid volume was also a strong, significant predictor of problem scores. Patient reports can be used to measure differences in quality of interpersonal care among hospitals. Only some of these differences are explained by patient and hospital characteristics, indicating that other factors facilitate or inhibit the delivery of high-quality interpersonal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8982524      PMCID: PMC2359308     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med        ISSN: 0028-7091


  9 in total

1.  Hospital quality trends. A short-form patient-based measure.

Authors:  R D Hays; C Larson; E C Nelson; P B Batalden
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; W McMullen; T L Delbanco
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-02

3.  Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; M Roberts; T W Moloney; W McMullen; J D Walker; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Involving consumers in quality of care assessment.

Authors:  A R Davies; J E Ware
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  The Employee Health Care Value Survey: round one.

Authors:  H M Allen; H Darling; D N McNeill; F Bastien
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Using patient reports to improve medical care: a preliminary report from 10 hospitals.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan; J D Walker; M Gerteis; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.926

8.  Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  H R Rubin; B Gandek; W H Rogers; M Kosinski; C A McHorney; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Satisfaction with ambulatory care of persons with AIDS: predictors of patient ratings of quality.

Authors:  V E Stone; J S Weissman; P D Cleary
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.128

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.

Authors:  E Davies; P D Cleary
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.