Literature DB >> 8979332

Use of sulfite and hydrogen peroxide to control bacterial contamination in ethanol fermentation.

I S Chang1, B H Kim, P K Shin.   

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria isolated from an industrial-scale ethanol fermentation process were used to evaluate sulfite as a bacterial-contamination control agent in a cell-recycled continuous ethanol fermentation process. The viabilities of bacteria were decreased by sulfite at concentrations of 100 to 400 mg liter-1, while sulfite at the same concentrations did not change the viability of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain used in this process. Sulfite was effective only in the presence of oxygen. Bacteria showed differences in their susceptibilities to sulfite. Facultatively heterofermentative Lactobacillus casei 4-3 was more susceptible than was obligatory heterofermentative Lactobacillus fermentum 7-1. The former showed higher enzyme activities involved in the production and consumption of hydrogen peroxide than did the latter. The viability of L. fermentum 7-1 could be selectively controlled by hydrogen peroxide at concentrations of 1 to 10 mM. Based on these findings, it is hypothesized that the sulfur trioxide radical anions formed by peroxidase in the presence of hydrogen peroxide are responsible for the control of contaminating bacteria. Sulfite did not kill the yeast strain, which has catalase to degrade hydrogen peroxide. A cell-recycled continuous ethanol fermentation process was run successfully with sulfite treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8979332      PMCID: PMC168295          DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.1.1-6.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Respiratory enzyme studies in Tetrahymena pyriformis. V. Some properties of an L-lactic oxidase.

Authors:  H J EICHEL; L T REM
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Penicillin and tetracycline as contamination control agents in alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses.

Authors:  E AQUARONE
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1960-09

Review 3.  Free radical reactions with DNA and its nucleotides.

Authors:  R P Mason; K Stolze; W D Flitter
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1990

4.  Destruction of tryptophan during the aerobic oxidation of sulfite ions.

Authors:  S F Yang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Alpha-glycerophosphate oxidase in Streptococcus faecium F 24.

Authors:  L K Koditschek; W W Umbreit
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  The cleavage of DNA by the oxygen-dependent reaction of bisulfite.

Authors:  H Hayatsu; R C Miller
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1972-01-14       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  The utility of superoxide dismutase in studying free radical reactions. I. Radicals generated by the interaction of sulfite, dimethyl sulfoxide, and oxygen.

Authors:  J M McCord; I Fridovich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1969-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Identification of two distinct NADH oxidases corresponding to H2O2-forming oxidase and H2O-forming oxidase induced in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  M Higuchi; M Shimada; Y Yamamoto; T Hayashi; T Koga; Y Kamio
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1993-10

9.  Sulfate anion free radical formation by the peroxidation of (Bi)sulfite and its reaction with hydroxyl radical scavengers.

Authors:  C Mottley; R P Mason
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 10.  Free radicals in toxicology.

Authors:  S D Aust; C F Chignell; T M Bray; B Kalyanaraman; R P Mason
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  13 in total

1.  Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery using a culture-independent method.

Authors:  Ohana Yonara Assis Costa; Betulia Morais Souto; Daiva Domenech Tupinambá; Jessica Carvalho Bergmann; Cynthia Maria Kyaw; Ricardo Henrique Kruger; Cristine Chaves Barreto; Betania Ferraz Quirino
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Antibacterial activity of a cell wall hydrolase from Lactobacillus paracasei NRRL B-50314 produced by recombinant Bacillus megaterium.

Authors:  Siqing Liu; Joseph O Rich; Amber Anderson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Urea hydrogen peroxide reduces the numbers of lactobacilli, nourishes yeast, and leaves no residues in the ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  N V Narendranath; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Metabolic responses to Lactobacillus plantarum contamination or bacteriophage treatment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a GC-MS-based metabolomics approach.

Authors:  Feng-Xia Cui; Rui-Min Zhang; Hua-Qing Liu; Yan-Feng Wang; Hao Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  A strategy to prevent the occurrence of Lactobacillus strains using lactate-tolerant yeast Candida glabrata in bioethanol production.

Authors:  Itsuki Watanabe; Toshihide Nakamura; Jun Shima
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Genome-wide transcriptional responses to sulfite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Hoon Park; Yoon-Sun Hwang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.422

9.  The Mechanisms of Thiosulfate Toxicity against Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zhigang Chen; Yongzhen Xia; Huaiwei Liu; Honglei Liu; Luying Xun
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

10.  Bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents against bacterial contaminants in yeast fermentation processes.

Authors:  Juliano Bertozzi Silva; Dominic Sauvageau
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.