PURPOSE: Central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) are often regarded as indicators of both circulating blood volume and cardiac preload. to evaluate these relationships, the response of each variable to induced volume shifts was tested. The relationships between these variables and cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SVI) was also recorded to assess the utility of each variable as an indicator of cardiac preload. The responses of the new variable intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) to the same maneuvers was also tested. To examine the effects of changes in cardiac output alone on ITBV, the effects of infusing dobutamine were studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten anesthetized piglets were studied during conditions of normovolemia, hypovolemia, and hypervolemia. The effects of an infusion of dobutamine were examined under normovolemia and hypovolemia. Cardiac output was measured by thermo-dilution, and ITBV was measured by double-indicator dilution. RESULTS: CI was correlated to CVP with r2 = .42 (P < or = .01), to PAOP with r2 = .43 (P < or = .01), to RVEDV index with r2 = .21 (P < or = .01), and to ITBV with r2 = .78 (P < or = .01) (pooled absolute values). Bias (mean difference of the percent changes with normovolemia = 100%) +/- 1 SD; for SVI - ITBV index was 1 +/- 22%, for SVI - CVP it was -128 +/- 214%; for SVI - PAOP it was -36 +/- 46%; and for SVI - RVEDV index it was 1 +/- 29%. Dobutamine infusion increased heart rate (to about 190 x min-1 and CI by 30% in normovolemia and hypovolemia, while ITBV remained basically unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Under the experimental conditions chosen neither CVP, PAOP, nor RVEDV reliably indicated changes in circulating blood volume, nor were they linearly and tightly correlated to the resulting changes in SVI. ITBV reflected both changes in volume status and the resulting alteration in cardiac output. The possibility that ITBV might be cardiac output-dependent was not supported. ITBV, therefore, shows potential as a clinically useful indicator of overall cardiac preload.
PURPOSE: Central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) are often regarded as indicators of both circulating blood volume and cardiac preload. to evaluate these relationships, the response of each variable to induced volume shifts was tested. The relationships between these variables and cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SVI) was also recorded to assess the utility of each variable as an indicator of cardiac preload. The responses of the new variable intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) to the same maneuvers was also tested. To examine the effects of changes in cardiac output alone on ITBV, the effects of infusing dobutamine were studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten anesthetized piglets were studied during conditions of normovolemia, hypovolemia, and hypervolemia. The effects of an infusion of dobutamine were examined under normovolemia and hypovolemia. Cardiac output was measured by thermo-dilution, and ITBV was measured by double-indicator dilution. RESULTS: CI was correlated to CVP with r2 = .42 (P < or = .01), to PAOP with r2 = .43 (P < or = .01), to RVEDV index with r2 = .21 (P < or = .01), and to ITBV with r2 = .78 (P < or = .01) (pooled absolute values). Bias (mean difference of the percent changes with normovolemia = 100%) +/- 1 SD; for SVI - ITBV index was 1 +/- 22%, for SVI - CVP it was -128 +/- 214%; for SVI - PAOP it was -36 +/- 46%; and for SVI - RVEDV index it was 1 +/- 29%. Dobutamine infusion increased heart rate (to about 190 x min-1 and CI by 30% in normovolemia and hypovolemia, while ITBV remained basically unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Under the experimental conditions chosen neither CVP, PAOP, nor RVEDV reliably indicated changes in circulating blood volume, nor were they linearly and tightly correlated to the resulting changes in SVI. ITBV reflected both changes in volume status and the resulting alteration in cardiac output. The possibility that ITBV might be cardiac output-dependent was not supported. ITBV, therefore, shows potential as a clinically useful indicator of overall cardiac preload.
Authors: Matthias S G Goepfert; Daniel A Reuter; Derya Akyol; Peter Lamm; Erich Kilger; Alwin E Goetz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Alexandre Mebazaa; Antonis A Pitsis; Alain Rudiger; Wolfgang Toller; Dan Longrois; Sven-Erik Ricksten; Ilona Bobek; Stefan De Hert; Georg Wieselthaler; Uwe Schirmer; Ludwig K von Segesser; Michael Sander; Don Poldermans; Marco Ranucci; Peter C J Karpati; Patrick Wouters; Manfred Seeberger; Edith R Schmid; Walter Weder; Ferenc Follath Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 9.097