OBJECTIVE: We examined whether guiding therapy by an algorithm based on optimizing the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) reduces the need for vasopressor and inotropic support and helps to shorten ICU stay in cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Single-center clinical study with a historical control group at an university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty cardiac bypass surgery patients were included prospectively and compared with a control group. INTERVENTIONS: In the goal-directed therapy (GDT) group hemodynamic management was guided by an algorithm based on GEDVI. Hemodynamic goals were: GEDVI above 640 ml/m2, cardiac index above 2.5 l/min/m2, and mean arterial pressure above 70 mmHg. The control group was treated at the discretion of the attending physician based on central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and clinical evaluation. RESULTS: In the GDT group duration of catecholamine and vasopressor dependence was shorter (187+/-70 vs. 1458+/-197 min), and fewer vasopressors (0.73+/-0.32 vs. 6.67+/-1.21 mg) and catecholamines (0.01+/-0.01 vs. 0.83+/-0.27mg) were administered. They received more colloids (6918+/-242 vs. 5514+/-171ml). Duration of mechanical ventilation (12.6+/-3.6 vs. 15.4+/4.3 h) and time until achieving status of fit for ICU discharge (25+/-13 vs. 33+/-17h) was shorter in the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Guiding therapy by an algorithm based on GEDVI leads to a shortened and reduced need for vasopressors, catecholamines, mechanical ventilation, and ICU therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether guiding therapy by an algorithm based on optimizing the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) reduces the need for vasopressor and inotropic support and helps to shorten ICU stay in cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Single-center clinical study with a historical control group at an university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty cardiac bypass surgery patients were included prospectively and compared with a control group. INTERVENTIONS: In the goal-directed therapy (GDT) group hemodynamic management was guided by an algorithm based on GEDVI. Hemodynamic goals were: GEDVI above 640 ml/m2, cardiac index above 2.5 l/min/m2, and mean arterial pressure above 70 mmHg. The control group was treated at the discretion of the attending physician based on central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and clinical evaluation. RESULTS: In the GDT group duration of catecholamine and vasopressor dependence was shorter (187+/-70 vs. 1458+/-197 min), and fewer vasopressors (0.73+/-0.32 vs. 6.67+/-1.21 mg) and catecholamines (0.01+/-0.01 vs. 0.83+/-0.27mg) were administered. They received more colloids (6918+/-242 vs. 5514+/-171ml). Duration of mechanical ventilation (12.6+/-3.6 vs. 15.4+/4.3 h) and time until achieving status of fit for ICU discharge (25+/-13 vs. 33+/-17h) was shorter in the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Guiding therapy by an algorithm based on GEDVI leads to a shortened and reduced need for vasopressors, catecholamines, mechanical ventilation, and ICU therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Authors: Daniel A Reuter; Thomas W Felbinger; Karl Moerstedt; Florian Weis; Christian Schmidt; Erich Kilger; Alwin E Goetz Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Rita Katzenelson; Azriel Perel; Haiim Berkenstadt; Sergei Preisman; Samuel Kogan; Leonid Sternik; Eran Segal Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Anand Kumar; Ramon Anel; Eugene Bunnell; Kalim Habet; Sergio Zanotti; Stephanie Marshall; Alex Neumann; Amjad Ali; Mary Cheang; Clifford Kavinsky; Joseph E Parrillo Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tong J Gan; Andrew Soppitt; Mohamed Maroof; Habib el-Moalem; Kerri M Robertson; Eugene Moretti; Peter Dwane; Peter S A Glass Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Andrea Székely; Tamás Breuer; Erzsébet Sápi; Edgár Székely; András Szatmári; Miklós Tóth; Balázs Hauser; János Gál Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Wolfgang Huber; Sebastian Mair; Simon Q Götz; Julia Tschirdewahn; Johanna Frank; Josef Höllthaler; Veit Phillip; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Tobias Lahmer; Sebastian Rasch; Christopher Schnappauf; Roland M Schmid; Wolfgang Huber Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 2.370