Literature DB >> 8977892

Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation.

M Rosenfield1, A S Cohen.   

Abstract

In order to determine whether a significant change has occurred in a clinical parameter, it is essential to assess the repeatability of the measurement procedure. Accordingly, the present study has examined the repeatability of three techniques for evaluating the subjective amplitude of accommodation. Clinical amplitudes were determined using the push-up, push-down and minus lens procedures in 13 young individuals (mean age: 24.3 years) on five separate occasions. The standard deviation (SD) of the five examinations was calculated for each individual and the mean values for the population sample determined. The mean SDs for the push-up, push-down and minus lens techniques were equivalent, with 95% confidence limits of approximately 1.4 D being observed for all three procedures. Furthermore, the mean amplitude recorded using the push-up technique was significantly higher than that observed for the other two procedures. It is concluded that a change of at least +/- 1.50 D should be adopted as the minimum significant shift in amplitude of accommodation for this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8977892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

1.  Repeatability intraexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommodation measurements.

Authors:  B Antona; F Barra; A Barrio; E Gonzalez; I Sanchez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Lens thickness with age and accommodation by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Mark A Bullimore; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The effect of phenylephrine on the ciliary muscle and accommodation.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Melissa D Bailey; Loraine T Sinnott; Chiu-Yen Kao; Karla Zadnik; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The Effect of Age, Accommodation, and Refractive Error on the Adult Human Eye.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Mark A Bullimore; Loraine T Sinnott; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Comparison of amplitude of accommodation, near point of convergence and fusion ability of islamic fasters before, during and after respected month of ramadan.

Authors:  S H Hoseini Yazdi; E Jafarzadehpur; A Mirzajani; M Nematy
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Accommodative amplitude using the minus lens at different near distances.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Jason S Ng; Bruno Mario Cesana; Abbas Ali Yekta; Mohammad Reza Sedaghat
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Cycloplegic Refraction in Hyperopic Children: Effectiveness of a 0.5% Tropicamide and 0.5% Phenylephrine Addition to 1% Cyclopentolate Regimen.

Authors:  Seul Gi Yoo; Myung Jin Cho; Ungsoo Samuel Kim; Seung Hee Baek
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-24

8.  Comparison of three monocular methods for measuring accommodative stimulus-response curves.

Authors:  Yunyun Chen; Wanqing Jin; Zhili Zheng; Chuanchuan Zhang; Huiling Lin; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Hao Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Diurnal variations of amplitude of accommodation in different age groups.

Authors:  Sun-Mi Park; Byeong-Yeon Moon; Sang-Yeob Kim; Dong-Sik Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing measurement techniques of accommodative amplitudes.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; James Kundart; Farshad Askarizadeh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.