Literature DB >> 8977262

Surface and mRNA expression of the CD52 antigen by human eosinophils but not by neutrophils.

J Elsner1, R Höchstetter, K Spiekermann, A Kapp.   

Abstract

Eosinophilic and neutrophilic granulocytes represent major effector cells in the inflammatory response. Whereas neutrophils are predominantly involved in bacterial infections, eosinophils are of essential importance in the allergic inflammation. Surface markers have been used to distinguish neutrophils (CD16+) from eosinophils (CD16-) and might indicate different functional properties of these cells. In this study, expression and functional activity of CD52 on human eosinophils and neutrophils was investigated in nonatopic healthy donors and from patients with hypereosinophilia. Flow cytometric analysis using different anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) (mouse IgG3, humanized IgG1, and rat IgM) showed significant and homogeneous expression of CD52 on human eosinophils, but not on neutrophils. In addition, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Northern blot analysis showed that CD52 mRNA was constitutively expressed in eosinophils but not in neutrophils. Furthermore, expression of CD52 could be diminished in a dose-dependent manner by preincubation of eosinophils with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, suggesting that CD52 on eosinophils is anchored to the membrane through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) molecule. Whereas the phorbolester phorbol myristate acetate was able to downregulate the expression of CD52 on eosinophils in a dose-dependent manner, different eosinophil activating cytokines and chemotaxins had no effect. Cross-linking of CD52 by mouse anti-CD52 MoAb (IgG3) and humanized anti-CD52 MoAb (IgG1) with goat antimouse antibody and mouse antihuman antibody, respectively, dose-dependently resulted in an inhibition of reactive oxygen species production of eosinophils after stimulation with C5a, platelet-activating factor, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. In summary, this study shows that the GPI-anchored antigen CD52 is not only a useful marker to distinguish eosinophils from neutrophils. The data point out a novel role of the CD52 antigen on human eosinophils that might be of clinical relevance, because cross-linking of this molecule will stop the destructive power of human eosinophils in the inflammatory tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8977262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  14 in total

Review 1.  Anti-cancer immune response mechanisms in neoadjuvant and targeted therapy.

Authors:  Carsten Denkert; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Sibylle Loibl; Ioannis Anagnostopoulos; Korinna Jöhrens
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 9.623

2.  Immune regulation by CD52-expressing CD4 T cells.

Authors:  Ban-Hock Toh; Tin Kyaw; Peter Tipping; Alex Bobik
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 3.  The immunological function of CD52 and its targeting in organ transplantation.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Huiting Su; Xiaofei Shen; Junfeng Du; Xiaodong Zhang; Yong Zhao
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 4.  Primary eosinophilic disorders: a concise review.

Authors:  Animesh Pardanani; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 5.  Hypereosinophilic syndrome and clonal eosinophilia: point-of-care diagnostic algorithm and treatment update.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Jason Gotlib; Animesh Pardanani
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Gene expression profiling during all-trans retinoic acid-induced cell differentiation of acute promyelocytic leukemia cells.

Authors:  Lijun Yang; Hongshan Zhao; Shi-Wu Li; Kim Ahrens; Christine Collins; Sarah Eckenrode; Qing-guo Ruan; Richard A McIndoe; Jin-Xiong She
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Circulating CD52 and CD20 levels at end of treatment predict for progression and survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR).

Authors:  Gheath Alatrash; Maher Albitar; Susan O'Brien; Xuemei Wang; Taghi Manshouri; Stefan Faderl; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Jan Burger; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop M Kantarjian; Susan Lerner; Michael J Keating; William G Wierda
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  Long-term follow-up of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome treated with Alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 antibody.

Authors:  Paolo Strati; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Hagop Kantarjian; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2012-11-01

9.  Alemtuzumab therapy for hypereosinophilic syndrome and chronic eosinophilic leukemia.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ayalew Tefferi; Hagop Kantarjian; Taghi Manshouri; Raja Luthra; Animesh Pardanani; Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Farhad Ravandi; Pat Ault; Carlos Bueso-Ramos; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Alemtuzumab in stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Geoff Hale
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.