Literature DB >> 8976627

An isometric predictor for maximum acceptable weight of lift for Chinese men.

Y H Lee1, Y L Chen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the practicality of the modified isometric strength tests to predict the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) of Chinese men. The modified strength tests allow the participant to pull on the load cell in front of the body and to apply force in a functional free posture. Both the modified and the standard strength data of each participant were used as predictors for the MAWLs. The prediction models were constructed and evaluated under task conditions of two lifting ranges, two box sizes, and three lifting frequencies. To realize the effect of modifications, testing posture was recorded and the joint angles were calculated. A stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that modified composite strength (MCS), chest circumference, and acromial height accounted for 86% to 91% of the variance. Because the strength of the upper extremity body was also recruited in the test, the weak upper extremity strength of the Chinese participants would therefore be better reflected. Evidence for the existence of a close match between MAWL and MCS values, as well as the task conditions for its existence, suggest that a simple isometric strength measure is a good predictor for the MAWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8976627     DOI: 10.1518/001872096778827242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  3 in total

Review 1.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags.

Authors:  Yi-Lang Chen; Ting-Kuang Ho
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Lifting speed preferences and their effects on the maximal lifting capacity.

Authors:  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin; Chih-Feng Cheng
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.179

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.