Literature DB >> 8971493

Effects of metabolic rate and ambient vapour pressure on heat strain in protective clothing.

T M McLellan1, J I Pope, J B Cain, S S Cheung.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that variations in ambient water vapour pressure from 1.7 to 3.7 kPa have little effect on heat tolerance time at a metabolic rate above 450 W while wearing protective clothing. With lighter exercise, where tolerance times exceed 60 min, variations in vapour pressure have a significant impact on evaporative heat loss and, therefore, heat tolerance. The present study has examined whether these findings extend to conditions with more extreme variations in vapour pressure. Twelve males performed light (L, 350 W) and heavy (H, 500 W) exercise at 40 degrees C in a dry (D, 1.1 kPa) and humid (H, 4.8 kPa) environment while wearing a semi-permeable nuclear, biological and chemical protective clothing ensemble (0.29 m2 x degree C-1.W-1 or 1.88 clo; Woodcock vapour permeability coefficient, im = 0.33). Partitional calorimetry was used to determine the rate of heat storage (S) with evaporative heat loss from the skin (Esk) calculated from changes in dressed mass or the physical properties of the clothing and the vapour pressure gradient between the skin and the environment. Skin vapour pressure was predicted from measurements of water vapour pressure above the skin surface and in the clothing with humidity sensors coupled with thermistors. Final mean skin temperature (Tsk) was higher for the humid trials and averaged 37.4 (0.3) degree C, 38.9 (0.4) degree C, 37.6 (0.5) degree C and 38.5 (0.4) degree C for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. Final rectal temperature (Tre) was higher for D with respective values for LD, LH, HD and HH of 39.0 (0.4) degree C, 38.7 (0.4) degree C, 38.8 (0.4) degree C and 38.5 (0.4) degree C. Tolerance time was significantly different among the trials and averaged 120.3 (19.3) min, 54.8 (7.3) min, 63.5 (6.9) min and 36.8 (3.1) min for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. Esk was overestimated and, therefore, S was underestimated when the changes in dressed mass were used to determine evaporative heat loss. When skin vapour pressure determined from the humidity sensor data was used to calculate Esk, heat storage was significantly different among the trials and averaged 15.0 (3.0), 13.0 (1.8), 14.2 (2.6) and 12.2 (1.9) kJ.kg-1 for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. It was concluded that while wearing the protective clothing all indices of heat strain, including tolerance time, were significantly affected by the change in ambient water vapour pressure from 1.1 to 4.8 kPa during both light and heavy exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8971493     DOI: 10.1007/bf02376767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  29 in total

1.  HUMAN TOLERANCE LIMITS FOR SOME THERMAL ENVIRONMENTS OF AEROSPACE.

Authors:  W C KAUFMAN
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1963-10

2.  Prediction modeling of physiological responses and human performance in the heat.

Authors:  K B Pandolf; L A Stroschein; L L Drolet; R R Gonzalez; M N Sawka
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Predicting rectal temperature response to work, environment, and clothing.

Authors:  B Givoni; R F Goldman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Emergence of real casualties during simulated chemical warfare training under high heat conditions.

Authors:  B J Carter; M Cammermeyer
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Determination of body heat storage in clothing: calorimetry versus thermometry.

Authors:  Y Aoyagi; T M McLellan; R J Shephard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

6.  Influence of temperature and metabolic rate on work performance with Canadian Forces NBC clothing.

Authors:  T M McLellan; I Jacobs; J B Bain
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1993-07

7.  Effects of training and acclimation on heat tolerance in exercising men wearing protective clothing.

Authors:  Y Aoyagi; T M McLellan; R J Shephard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

8.  Thermal strain resulting from protective clothing of an armored vehicle crew in warm conditions.

Authors:  R Henane; J Bittel; R Viret; S Morino
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1979-06

9.  The topography of eccrine sweating in humans during exercise.

Authors:  J D Cotter; M J Patterson; N A Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

10.  How should body heat storage be determined in humans: by thermometry or calorimetry?

Authors:  A L Vallerand; G Savourey; A M Hanniquet; J H Bittel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The thermophysiology of uncompensable heat stress. Physiological manipulations and individual characteristics.

Authors:  S S Cheung; T M McLellan; S Tenaglia
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Non-evaporative effects of a wet mid layer on heat transfer through protective clothing.

Authors:  Peter Bröde; George Havenith; Xiaoxin Wang; Victor Candas; Emiel A den Hartog; Barbara Griefahn; Ingvar Holmér; Kalev Kuklane; Harriet Meinander; Wolfgang Nocker; Mark Richards
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Evaluation of the limits to accurate sweat loss prediction during prolonged exercise.

Authors:  Samuel N Cheuvront; Scott J Montain; Daniel A Goodman; Laurie Blanchard; Michael N Sawka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Thermometry and calorimetry assessment of sweat response during exercise in the heat.

Authors:  Andreas D Flouris; Stephen S Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Peripheral markers of central fatigue in trained and untrained during uncompensable heat stress.

Authors:  Heather E Wright; Glen A Selkirk; Shawn G Rhind; Tom M McLellan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  HPA and SAS responses to increasing core temperature during uncompensable exertional heat stress in trained and untrained males.

Authors:  Heather E Wright; Glen A Selkirk; Tom M McLellan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  An Overt Chemical Protective Garment Reduces Thermal Strain Compared with a Covert Garment in Warm-Wet but Not Hot-Dry Environments.

Authors:  Matthew J Maley; Joseph T Costello; David N Borg; Aaron J E Bach; Andrew P Hunt; Ian B Stewart
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Fractional Contribution of Wildland Firefighters' Personal Protective Equipment on Physiological Strain.

Authors:  Belén Carballo-Leyenda; José G Villa; Jorge López-Satué; Pilar S Collado; Jose A Rodríguez-Marroyo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Impact of Different Personal Protective Clothing on Wildland Firefighters' Physiological Strain.

Authors:  Belén Carballo-Leyenda; José G Villa; Jorge López-Satué; Jose A Rodríguez-Marroyo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.