BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White matter lesions (WML) may result from cerebral hypoperfusion or ischemia. We investigated the association of WML with blood pressure, hypertension, and its treatment and control. METHODS: A random sample of 1920 participants aged 55 to 72 years in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) was examined. Spin-density 1.5-T MRI scan images were coded from 0 for normal to 9 for most severe WML. Hypertension was defined as systolic or diastolic pressure > or = 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication. RESULTS: The percentages of persons with WML grades 0 through 2 and 3 through 9, respectively, were as follow: normotensive, 92.4% and 7.6%, versus all hypertensive subjects, 83% and 17% (P < .001); and treated controlled hypertensive, 86% and 14%, versus treated uncontrolled hypertensive subjects, 76% and 24% (P = .003). Multivariable adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for WML grade > or = 3 relative to normotensive subjects was 2.34 (1.71 to 3.20) for all hypertensives, 1.99 (1.19 to 3.08) for untreated hypertensives, 1.94 (1.32 to 2.85) for treated controlled hypertensives, and 3.40 (2.30 to 5.03) for treated uncontrolled hypertensives. After additional adjustment for hypertension duration, treatment, and control status, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for a 1 SD increase of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 1.43 (1.11 to 1.85) and 1.16 (0.94 to 1.43), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension is associated with increased odds of WML, and treated uncontrolled hypertensive subjects have greater odds of WML than those with treated controlled hypertension. The data suggest that the level of blood pressure, especially systolic blood pressure, is related to WML, additional to the effects of categorically defined hypertension and its treatment and control status.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:White matter lesions (WML) may result from cerebral hypoperfusion or ischemia. We investigated the association of WML with blood pressure, hypertension, and its treatment and control. METHODS: A random sample of 1920 participants aged 55 to 72 years in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) was examined. Spin-density 1.5-T MRI scan images were coded from 0 for normal to 9 for most severe WML. Hypertension was defined as systolic or diastolic pressure > or = 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication. RESULTS: The percentages of persons with WML grades 0 through 2 and 3 through 9, respectively, were as follow: normotensive, 92.4% and 7.6%, versus all hypertensive subjects, 83% and 17% (P < .001); and treated controlled hypertensive, 86% and 14%, versus treated uncontrolled hypertensive subjects, 76% and 24% (P = .003). Multivariable adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for WML grade > or = 3 relative to normotensive subjects was 2.34 (1.71 to 3.20) for all hypertensives, 1.99 (1.19 to 3.08) for untreated hypertensives, 1.94 (1.32 to 2.85) for treated controlled hypertensives, and 3.40 (2.30 to 5.03) for treated uncontrolled hypertensives. After additional adjustment for hypertension duration, treatment, and control status, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for a 1 SD increase of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 1.43 (1.11 to 1.85) and 1.16 (0.94 to 1.43), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Hypertension is associated with increased odds of WML, and treated uncontrolled hypertensive subjects have greater odds of WML than those with treated controlled hypertension. The data suggest that the level of blood pressure, especially systolic blood pressure, is related to WML, additional to the effects of categorically defined hypertension and its treatment and control status.
Authors: D C Bezerra; A R Sharrett; K Matsushita; R F Gottesman; D Shibata; T H Mosley; J Coresh; M Szklo; M S Carvalho; E Selvin Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Charles H Brown; A Richey Sharrett; Josef Coresh; Andrea L C Schneider; Alvaro Alonso; David S Knopman; Thomas H Mosley; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marco Inzitari; Stephanie Studenski; Caterina Rosano; Neil A Zakai; William T Longstreth; Mary Cushman; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-09-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew M Demchuk; Firosh Khan; Michael D Hill; Philip A Barber; Brian Silver; Suresh Patel; Steven R Levine Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Frank A Provenzano; Jordan Muraskin; Giuseppe Tosto; Atul Narkhede; Ben T Wasserman; Erica Y Griffith; Vanessa A Guzman; Irene B Meier; Molly E Zimmerman; Adam M Brickman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 18.302