Literature DB >> 8968181

Gradual reduction of endotracheal tube diameter during mechanical ventilation via different humidification devices.

M C Villafane1, G Cinnella, F Lofaso, D Isabey, A Harf, F Lemaire, L Brochard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest that increased resistance to flow within endotracheal tubes (ETT) may occur in patients whose lungs are mechanically ventilated for more than 48 h, especially when airway humidification is inadequate. This could lead to sudden ETT obstruction or induce excessive loading during spontaneous breathing.
METHODS: Twenty-three such patients were randomly assigned to three types of airway humidifier based on three different working principles: a Fisher Paykell hot water system (n = 7), a Pall BB2215 heat and moisture exchanger (HME) hydrophobic filter (n = 8), and a Dar Hygrobac 35254111 HME hygroscopic filter (n = 8). The decrease in internal pressure along the ETT and the flow rate were measured in each patient every 2 days. An "effective inner diameter" was derived from these measurements and allowed the inner ETT configuration to be monitored.
RESULTS: On the first day of intubation, the mean diameter was similar in the three groups, and was slightly smaller than the in vitro diameter (mean +/- SD: 7.6 +/- 0.6 mm for Fisher-Paykell, 7.7 +/- 0.4 for Pall, and 7.5 +/- 0.4 for Dar). The mean diameter tended to decrease from day to day. At the end of the study, the overall reduction in mean diameter was significantly greater with the hydrophobic HME (Pall) than with the two other systems (Pall: -6.5 +/- 4% vs. 2.5 +/- 2.5% for Dar and 1.5 +/- 3% for Fisher-Paykell; P < 0.01 with analysis of variance). The same was true of the mean reduction in effective inner ETT diameter expressed per day of ventilation (-1.6 +/- 1.5% per day for Pall vs. -0.5 +/- 0.4% for Dar and -0.2 +/- 0.4% for Fisher-Paykell; P < 0.01). In four patients, the ETT became obstructed and emergency repeated tracheal intubation was required. The Pall HME and the Fisher-Paykell system were being used in three and one patient, respectively. Before obstruction, the reduction in ETT diameter was significantly greater for these four patients than for the remaining 23 patients (7.8 +/- 1.4% vs. 3.1 +/- 4.1%; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: During prolonged mechanical ventilation, significant alterations in inner ETT configuration occur frequently and are influenced by the type of humidification device used. In vivo monitoring of ETT mechanical properties might be clinically useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8968181     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  18 in total

1.  Effect of humidifying devices on the measurement of tidal volume by mechanical ventilators.

Authors:  Yasuki Fujita; Hideaki Imanaka; Yuji Fujino; Muneyuki Takeuchi; Toshiji Tomita; Takashi Mashimo; Masaji Nishimura
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of the effects of two humidifier systems on endotracheal tube resistance.

Authors:  Indalecio Morán; Belén Cabello; Elizabeth Manero; Jordi Mancebo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Reduction of Endotracheal Tube Biofilms Using Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Merrill A Biel; Chet Sievert; Marina Usacheva; Matthew Teichert; Eric Wedell; Nicolas Loebel; Andreas Rose; Ron Zimmermann
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  A clinical assessment of the Mucus Shaver: a device to keep the endotracheal tube free from secretions.

Authors:  Lorenzo Berra; Andrea Coppadoro; Edward A Bittner; Theodor Kolobow; Patrice Laquerriere; Joshua R Pohlmann; Simone Bramati; Joel Moss; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Tracheal pressure and endotracheal tube obstruction can be detected by continuous cuff pressure monitoring: in vitro pilot study.

Authors:  Shai Efrati; Israel Deutsch; Gabriel M Gurman; Matitiau Noff; Giorgio Conti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Endotracheal tube intraluminal diameter narrowing after mechanical ventilation: use of acoustic reflectometry.

Authors:  M C Boqué; B Gualis; A Sandiumenge; J Rello
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Alveolar pressure monitoring: an evaluation in a lung model and in patients with acute lung injury.

Authors:  S Sondergaard; S Kárason; J Wiklund; S Lundin; O Stenqvist
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Internally coated endotracheal tubes with silver sulfadiazine in polyurethane to prevent bacterial colonization: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Lorenzo Berra; Theodor Kolobow; Patrice Laquerriere; Betsey Pitts; Simone Bramati; Joshua Pohlmann; Chiara Marelli; Miriam Panzeri; Pietro Brambillasca; Federico Villa; Andrea Baccarelli; Sylvie Bouthors; Henry T Stelfox; Luca M Bigatello; Joel Moss; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Mechanical effects of heat-moisture exchangers in ventilated patients.

Authors:  G A Iotti; M C Olivei; A Braschi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999-09-23       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Evaluating humidity recovery efficiency of currently available heat and moisture exchangers: a respiratory system model study.

Authors:  Jeanette Janaina Jaber Lucato; Alexander Bernard Adams; Rogério Souza; Jamili Anbar Torquato; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho; John J Marini
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.