Literature DB >> 8964751

Contribution of phosphocreatine and aerobic metabolism to energy supply during repeated sprint exercise.

G C Bogdanis1, M E Nevill, L H Boobis, H K Lakomy.   

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of phosphocreatine (PCr) and aerobic metabolism during repeated bouts of sprint exercise. Eight male subjects performed two cycle ergometer sprints separated by 4 min of recovery during two separate main trials. Sprint 1 lasted 30 s during both main trials, whereas sprint 2 lasted either 10 or 30 s. Muscle biopsies were obtained at rest, immediately after the first 30-s sprint, after 3.8 min of recovery, and after the second 10- and 30-s sprints. At the end of sprint 1, PCr was 16.9 +/- 1.4% of the resting value, and muscle pH dropped to 6.69 +/- 0.02. After 3.8 min of recovery, muscle pH remained unchanged (6.80 +/- 0.03), but PCr was resynthesized to 78.7 +/- 3.3% of the resting value. PCr during sprint 2 was almost completely utilized in the first 10 s and remained unchanged thereafter. High correlations were found between the percentage of PCr resynthesis and the percentage recovery of power output and pedaling speed during the initial 10 s of sprint 2 (r = 0.84, P < 0.05 and r = 0.91, P < 0.01). The anaerobic ATP turnover, as calculated from changes in ATP, PCr, and lactate, was 235 +/- 9 mmol/kg dry muscle during the first sprint but was decreased to 139 +/- 7 mmol/kg dry muscle during the second 30-s sprint, mainly as a result of a approximately 45% decrease in glycolysis. Despite this approximately 41% reduction in anaerobic energy, the total work done during the second 30-s sprint was reduced by only approximately 18%. This mismatch between anaerobic energy release and power output during sprint 2 was partly compensated for by an increased contribution of aerobic metabolism, as calculated from the increase in oxygen uptake during sprint 2 (2.68 +/- 0.10 vs. 3.17 +/- 0.13 l/min; sprint 1 vs. sprint 2; P < 0.01). These data suggest that aerobic metabolism provides a significant part (approximately 49%) of the energy during the second sprint, whereas PCr availability is important for high power output during the initial 10 s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8964751     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.3.876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  146 in total

Review 1.  Interval training for performance: a scientific and empirical practice. Special recommendations for middle- and long-distance running. Part II: anaerobic interval training.

Authors:  L V Billat
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The relationship between aerobic fitness and recovery from high intensity intermittent exercise.

Authors:  D L Tomlin; H A Wenger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Long-term metabolic and skeletal muscle adaptations to short-sprint training: implications for sprint training and tapering.

Authors:  A Ross; M Leveritt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Influence of two pedalling rate conditions on mechanical output and physiological responses during all-out intermittent exercise.

Authors:  Sylvain Dorel; Muriel Bourdin; Emmanuel Van Praagh; Jean-René Lacour; Christophe André Hautier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of increased intensity of intermittent training in runners with differing VO2 kinetics.

Authors:  G P Millet; S Libicz; F Borrani; P Fattori; F Bignet; R Candau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Muscle buffer capacity and aerobic fitness are associated with repeated-sprint ability in women.

Authors:  David Bishop; Johann Edge; Carmel Goodman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Effects of 20-s and 180-s double poling interval training in cross-country skiers.

Authors:  Johnny E Nilsson; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Per Tveit; Jostein Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Effect of inter-repetition rest on ratings of perceived exertion during multiple sets of the power clean.

Authors:  Justin P Hardee; Marcus M Lawrence; Alan C Utter; N Travis Triplett; Kevin A Zwetsloot; Jeffrey M McBride
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Factors affecting the rate of phosphocreatine resynthesis following intense exercise.

Authors:  Shaun McMahon; David Jenkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Metabolic stress-dependent regulation of the mitochondrial biogenic molecular response to high-intensity exercise in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M Fiorenza; T P Gunnarsson; M Hostrup; F M Iaia; F Schena; H Pilegaard; J Bangsbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.