Literature DB >> 22215288

Effect of inter-repetition rest on ratings of perceived exertion during multiple sets of the power clean.

Justin P Hardee1, Marcus M Lawrence, Alan C Utter, N Travis Triplett, Kevin A Zwetsloot, Jeffrey M McBride.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of inter-repetition rest (IRR) on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) in the power clean exercise in a multiple set protocol using peak power as an indication of fatigue. Ten resistance-trained males participated in four testing sessions which consisted of determination of a one repetition maximum (1RM) in the power clean exercise (session 1) and performance of three sets of six repetitions at 80% of 1RM with 0 (P0), 20 (P20), or 40 s (P40) IRR (sessions 2-4). Fatigue during all three conditions was indicated by a significant decrease in power of 9.0% (P0), 3.0% (P20) and 2.1% (P40), respectively. Significant difference in the rate of power decrease in P40 indicates less fatigue in comparison to P0 and P20. P40 resulted in a significantly lower RPE compared to P0 and P20 (7.43 ± 0.34, 6.46 ± 0.47, and 5.30 ± 0.55, respectively). RPE increased significantly (p ≤ 0.01) within each set (5.26 ± 0.37, 6.46 ± 0.44, and 7.46 ± 0.53; sets 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Significant difference in average RPE between the conditions indicates that RPE is not a determinant of intensity (% of 1RM) but the rate of fatigue (decreases in peak power). In addition, the fact that RPE increased between sets 1, 2 and 3 during all conditions support the same conclusion. The results demonstrate that increasing IRR in power clean training decreases the perception of effort and is inversely related to the rate of fatigue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215288     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2300-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  29 in total

1.  Standardized scaling procedures for rating perceived exertion during resistance exercise.

Authors:  R E Gearhart; F L Goss; K M Lagally; J M Jakicic; J Gallagher; R J Robertson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Ratings of perceived exertion and muscle activity during the bench press exercise in recreational and novice lifters.

Authors:  Kristen M Lagally; Steven T McCaw; Geoff T Young; Heather C Medema; David Q Thomas
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Effect of interrepetition rest intervals on weight training repetition power output.

Authors:  Trent W Lawton; John B Cronin; Rod P Lindsell
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Validation of power measurement techniques in dynamic lower body resistance exercises.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Jeffrey M McBride; Grant O McCaulley
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Muscle fibre conduction velocity during a 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.

Authors:  David Stewart; Dario Farina; Chao Shen; Andrea Macaluso
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 6.  The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: a reappraisal of older and recent concepts.

Authors:  P E di Prampero; G Ferretti
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1999-12-01

7.  Using perceived exertion to prescribe and monitor exercise training heart rate.

Authors:  R K Dishman; R W Patton; J Smith; R Weinberg; A Jackson
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Metabolic cost and perception of effort during bicycle ergometer work performance.

Authors:  B A Stamford; B J Noble
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1974

9.  The effects of rest interval length on ratings of perceived exertion during dynamic knee extension exercise.

Authors:  Staci Woods; Tawny Bridge; David Nelson; Kelly Risse; Danny M Pincivero
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Effects of fatiguing exercise on high-energy phosphates, force, and EMG: evidence for three phases of recovery.

Authors:  R G Miller; D Giannini; H S Milner-Brown; R B Layzer; A P Koretsky; D Hooper; M W Weiner
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  11 in total

1.  Strengthening the Case for Cluster Set Resistance Training in Aged and Clinical Settings: Emerging Evidence, Proposed Benefits and Suggestions.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Carolyn Peddle-McIntyre; Lauren Marcotte; James Steele; Kristina Kendall; Ciaran M Fairman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Paul Comfort; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Chronic Effects of Altering Resistance Training Set Configurations Using Cluster Sets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy B Davies; Derek L Tran; Clorinda M Hogan; G Gregory Haff; Christopher Latella
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Acute response to cluster sets in trained and untrained men.

Authors:  Jonathan M Oliver; Andreas Kreutzer; Shane Jenke; Melody D Phillips; Joel B Mitchell; Margaret T Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Study protocol: investigating the feasibility of a hybrid delivery of home-based cluster set resistance training for individuals previously treated for lung cancer.

Authors:  C M Fairman; O L Owens; K L Kendall; J Steele; C Latella; M T Jones; L Marcotte; C M J Peddle-McIntyre; K K McDonnell
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-05-18

6.  Acute Effects of Cluster and Rest Redistribution Set Structures on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Fatigue During and After Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Amador García Ramos; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Set Configuration in Resistance Exercise: Muscle Fatigue and Cardiovascular Effects.

Authors:  Dan Río-Rodríguez; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; Miguel Fernández Del Olmo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effects of traditional, superset, and tri-set resistance training structures on perceived intensity and physiological responses.

Authors:  Jonathon J S Weakley; Kevin Till; Dale B Read; Gregory A B Roe; Joshua Darrall-Jones; Padraic J Phibbs; Ben Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  A comparison of traditional and novel metrics to quantify resistance training.

Authors:  Kieran J Marston; Jeremiah J Peiffer; Michael J Newton; Brendan R Scott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Are rate of perceived exertion and feelings of pleasure/displeasure modified in elderly women undergoing 8 week of strength training of prescribe intensity?

Authors:  Mariana L Benites; Ragami C Alves; Sandro S Ferreira; Lucio Follador; Sergio G da Silva
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.