Literature DB >> 8962836

Visual cortex neurons in monkey and cat: effect of contrast on the spatial and temporal phase transfer functions.

D G Albrecht1.   

Abstract

The responses of simple cells (recorded from within the striate visual cortex) were measured as a function of the contrast and the frequency of sine-wave grating patterns in order to explore the effect of contrast on the spatial and temporal phase transfer functions and on the spatiotemporal receptive field. In general, as the contrast increased, the phase of the response advanced by approximately 45 ms (approximately one-quarter of a cycle for frequencies near 5 Hz), although the exact value varied from cell to cell. The dynamics of this phase-advance were similar to the dynamics of the amplitude: the amplitude and the phase increased in an accelerating fashion at lower contrasts and then saturated at higher contrasts. Further, the gain for both the amplitude and the phase appeared to be governed by the magnitude of the contrast rather than the magnitude of the response. For the spatial phase transfer function, variations in contrast had little or no systematic effect; all of the phase responses clustered around a single straight line, with a common slope and intercept. This implies that the phase-advance was not due to a change in the spatial properties of the neuron; it also implies that the phase-advance was not systematically related to the magnitude of the response amplitude. On the other hand, for the temporal phase transfer function, the phase responses fell on five straight lines, related to the five steps in contrast. As the contrast increased, the phase responses advanced such that both the slope and the intercept were affected. This implies that the phase-advance was a result of contrast-induced changes in both the response latency and the shape/symmetry of the temporal receptive field.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8962836     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800006817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  52 in total

1.  Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity of V1 neurons in cats.

Authors:  Tianmiao Hua; Pinglei Bao; Chang-Bing Huang; Zhenhua Wang; Jinwang Xu; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Limit of spared pattern vision following lesions of the immature visual cortex.

Authors:  Bertram R Payne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration.

Authors:  James M G Tsui; J Nicholas Hunter; Richard T Born; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial phase sensitivity of complex cells in primary visual cortex depends on stimulus contrast.

Authors:  H Meffin; M A Hietanen; S L Cloherty; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A nonlinear model of the behavior of simple cells in visual cortex.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Habituation of retinal ganglion cell activity in response to steady state pattern visual stimuli in normal subjects.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti; Nancy Sorokac; William Buchser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Mechanisms of Spatiotemporal Selectivity in Cortical Area MT.

Authors:  Ambarish S Pawar; Sergei Gepshtein; Sergey Savel'ev; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Comparison of contrast-response functions from multifocal visual-evoked potentials (mfVEPs) and functional MRI responses.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Xian Zhang; John Ferrera; Joy Hirsch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.