Literature DB >> 8962825

Brightness perception, illusory contours, and corticogeniculate feedback.

A Gove1, S Grossberg, E Mingolla.   

Abstract

A neural network model is developed to explain how visual thalamocortical interactions give rise to boundary percepts such as illusory contours and surface percepts such as filled-in brightnesses. Top-down feedback interactions are needed in addition to bottom-up feed-forward interactions to simulate these data. One feedback loop is modeled between lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and cortical area V1, and another within cortical areas V1 and V2. The first feedback loop realizes a matching process which enhances LGN cell activities that are consistent with those of active cortical cells, and suppresses LGN activities that are not. This corticogeniculate feedback, being endstopped and oriented, also enhances LGN ON cell activations at the ends of thin dark lines, thereby leading to enhanced cortical brightness percepts when the lines group into closed illusory contours. The second feedback loop generates boundary representations, including illusory contours, that coherently bind distributed cortical features together. Brightness percepts form within the surface representations through a diffusive filling-in process that is contained by resistive gating signals from the boundary representations. The model is used to simulate illusory contours and surface brightness induced by Ehrenstein disks, Kanizsa squares, Glass patterns, and café wall patterns in single contrast, reverse contrast, and mixed contrast configurations. These examples illustrate how boundary and surface mechanisms can generate percepts that are highly context-sensitive, including how illusory contours can be amodally recognized without being seen, how model simple cells in V1 respond preferentially to luminance discontinuities using inputs from both LGN ON and OFF cells, how model bipole cells in V2 with two colinear receptive fields can help to complete curved illusory contours, how short-range simple cell groupings and long-range bipole cell groupings can sometimes generate different outcomes, and how model double-opponent, filling-in and boundary segmentation mechanisms in V4 interact to generate surface brightness percepts in which filling-in of enhanced brightness and darkness can occur before the net brightness distribution is computed by double-opponent interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8962825     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800006702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  19 in total

Review 1.  Is most of neural plasticity in the thalamus cortical?

Authors:  J H Kaas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is neural filling-in necessary to explain the perceptual completion of motion and depth information?

Authors:  Andrew E Welchman; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Perceptual binding of sensory events: the inclusive characteristics model.

Authors:  V Ya Sergin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10

4.  Specificity of V1-V2 orientation networks in the primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Anna W Roe; Daniel Y Ts'o
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Some facilitatory effects of lorazepam on dynamic visual binding.

Authors:  Mark A Elliott; Anne Giersch; Doerthe Seifert
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Anomalous induction of brightness and surface qualities: a new illusion due to radial lines and chromatic rings.

Authors:  Baingio Pinna; Lothar Spillmann; John S Werner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Receptive field focus of visual area V4 neurons determines responses to illusory surfaces.

Authors:  Michele A Cox; Michael C Schmid; Andrew J Peters; Richard C Saunders; David A Leopold; Alexander Maier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Karthik Srinivasan; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 9.  Cortical and subcortical predictive dynamics and learning during perception, cognition, emotion and action.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A neural model of multimodal adaptive saccadic eye movement control by superior colliculus.

Authors:  S Grossberg; K Roberts; M Aguilar; D Bullock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.