Literature DB >> 8962069

The leucine zipper may induce electrophoretic mobility anomalies without DNA bending.

R J McCormick1, T Badalian, D E Fisher.   

Abstract

Numerous proteins bend DNA upon binding, a phenomenon of potential significance for regulation of gene expression and chromatin. DNA bending is commonly predicted from the presence of electrophoretic mobility anomalies in protein-DNA complexes. However, as compared with electrophoretic methods, several DNA binding oncoprotein families do not display comparable evidence of DNA bends in x-ray structural studies. Herein, circularization kinetics and affinity measurements with prebent DNA templates were employed to assess bending and DNA structural preferences for Max and other basic helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper proteins. In this way, proteins in the Myc/Max basic helix-loop-helix/ leucine zipper family were found not to bend DNA in solution but to actually stabilize DNA in an unbent configuration that resists circularization. The mobility anomaly was found to be induced by the leucine zipper protein motif, rather than structural distortions of DNA. Thus rigid protein domain structures may induce anomalous electrophoretic mobility. Moreover, the energetic preference of non-DNA bending proteins for unbent templates suggests mechanisms whereby chromatin structure may regulate transcription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8962069      PMCID: PMC26150          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  Fos-Jun heterodimers and Jun homodimers bend DNA in opposite orientations: implications for transcription factor cooperativity.

Authors:  T K Kerppola; T Curran
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-07-26       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Helical phasing between DNA bends and the determination of bend direction.

Authors:  J J Salvo; N D Grindley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-12-10       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Calibration of DNA curvature and a unified description of sequence-directed bending.

Authors:  H S Koo; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Direct evidence for DNA bending at the lambda replication origin.

Authors:  K Zahn; F R Blattner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  DNA bend direction by phase sensitive detection.

Authors:  S S Zinkel; D M Crothers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The structure of an oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications.

Authors:  H C Nelson; J T Finch; B F Luisi; A Klug
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Nov 19-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Fos and Jun do not bend the AP-1 recognition site.

Authors:  A Sitlani; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Empirical estimation of protein-induced DNA bending angles: applications to lambda site-specific recombination complexes.

Authors:  J F Thompson; A Landy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending.

Authors:  H M Wu; D M Crothers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Apr 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Molecular characterization of the GCN4-DNA complex.

Authors:  M R Gartenberg; C Ampe; T A Steitz; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  The SKN-1 amino-terminal arm is a DNA specificity segment.

Authors:  T Kophengnavong; A S Carroll; T K Blackwell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  DNA bending induced by DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases.

Authors:  T Raskó; C Finta; A Kiss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Similarities and differences in the conformation of protein-DNA complexes at the U1 and U6 snRNA gene promoters.

Authors:  S B Hardin; C J Ortler; K J McNamara-Schroeder; W E Stumph
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The orientation of the AP-1 heterodimer on DNA strongly affects transcriptional potency.

Authors:  M Chytil; B R Peterson; D A Erlanson; G L Verdine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA-binding domains of Fos and Jun do not induce DNA curvature: an investigation with solution and gel methods.

Authors:  A Sitlani; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Solution structure of the ATF-2 recognition site and its interaction with the ATF-2 peptide.

Authors:  M R Conte; A N Lane; G Bloomberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Targeting of the visna virus tat protein to AP-1 sites: interactions with the bZIP domains of fos and jun in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  B A Morse; L M Carruth; J E Clements
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  The roles of Sp1, Sp3, USF1/USF2 and NRF-1 in the regulation and three-dimensional structure of the Fragile X mental retardation gene promoter.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Andrei Gabrielian; David Wheeler; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Efficacy of Antibacterial Peptides Against Peptide-Resistant MRSA Is Restored by Permeabilization of Bacteria Membranes.

Authors:  Joshua Ravensdale; Zachary Wong; Frances O'Brien; Keith Gregg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.