Literature DB >> 8961189

Synaptic input from the retina to the suprachiasmatic nucleus changes with the light-dark cycle in the Syrian hamster.

L N Cui1, R E Dyball.   

Abstract

1. Single cell extracellular recordings were made from the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in urethane-anaesthetized Syrian hamsters at different times of the light-dark cycle. Peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) were created following stimulation of the optic nerve. 2. Both short-latency (< 50 ms) and long-latency (> 50 ms) excitatory responses were seen. Almost all inhibitory responses had a short latency. 3. A total of 288 SCN neurones were recorded. Taking all types of response together, 55 (36.9%) of the 149 neurones tested in the dark period responded to optic nerve stimulation while only 23 (16.6%) of the 139 neurones tested in the light period responded. The difference between the proportion of all responsive and non-responsive neurones in the dark and light periods was highly significant (P < 0.01, Fisher's exact probability test). The difference in the proportion of excitatory responses was also significant (P < 0.01). 4. During the dark period, the mean spontaneous firing rate (5.00 +/- 0.88 spikes s-1; mean +/- S.E.M., n = 55) of the responsive cells was significantly higher than that of the non-responsive cells (2.65 +/- 0.33 spikes s-1; mean +/- S.E.M., n = 74; P < 0.01; Student's unpaired t test). 5. Injection of APV (20 mM, 2 microliters, I.C.V.; n = 6), an antagonist for the NMDA receptor, or CNQX (10 mM, 2 microliters, I.C.V.; n = 5), an antagonist of the non-NMDA receptor, significantly reduced the responses of all the neurones tested. 6. We conclude that there is daily variation in the firing of SCN neurones in vivo and the variation is restricted to those cells receiving optic nerve inputs. The change in the responsiveness of the SCN to optic nerve stimulation at different times of day suggests that there is a rapidly changing cycle of synaptic function in the SCN. The action of the antagonists suggests that the excitatory retinal projections to the SCN which show this variation are mediated by glutamate and that both NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8961189      PMCID: PMC1160998          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  37 in total

1.  Spontaneous and stimulated firing in cultured rat suprachiasmatic neurons.

Authors:  I B Walsh; R J van den Berg; E Marani; W J Rietveld
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-08-14       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  NMDA and non-NMDA receptor antagonists inhibit photic induction of Fos protein in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  H Abe; B Rusak; H A Robertson
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Intracellular electrophysiological study of suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons in rodents: inhibitory synaptic mechanisms.

Authors:  Y I Kim; F E Dudek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms.

Authors:  D K Welsh; D E Logothetis; M Meister; S M Reppert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Neuronal synchronization without calcium-dependent synaptic transmission in the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Y Bouskila; F E Dudek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  NMDA as well as non-NMDA receptor antagonists can prevent the phase-shifting effects of light on the circadian system of the golden hamster.

Authors:  C S Colwell; M Menaker
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.182

7.  The effects of electrical stimulation of the optic nerves and anterior optic chiasm on the circadian activity rhythm of the Syrian hamster: involvement of excitatory amino acids.

Authors:  M J de Vries; J A Treep; E S de Pauw; J H Meijer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-04-11       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Circadian expression of NMDA receptor mRNAs, epsilon 3 and zeta 1, in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of rat brain.

Authors:  N Ishida; M Matsui; Y Mitsui; M Mishina
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1994-01-31       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomotor activity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions.

Authors:  F K Stephan; I Zucker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  In situ hybridization of antisense mRNA oligonucleotides for AMPA, NMDA and metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus at different phases of the circadian cycle.

Authors:  R L Gannon; M A Rea
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1994-06
View more
  14 in total

1.  Enhanced NMDA receptor activity in retinal inputs to the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus during the subjective night.

Authors:  C M Pennartz; R Hamstra; A M Geurtsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Responses of neurones of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus to retinal illumination under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Authors:  N C Aggelopoulos; H Meissl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Modulation of photic response by the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist t-ACPD.

Authors:  Laurel L Haak; H Elliott Albers; Eric M Mintz
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Expression of clock genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus: effect of environmental lighting conditions.

Authors:  Lily Yan
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Linking neural activity and molecular oscillations in the SCN.

Authors:  Christopher S Colwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Neurones in the supraoptic nucleus of the rat are regulated by a projection from the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  L N Cui; K Saeb-Parsy; R E Dyball
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  NMDA-evoked calcium transients and currents in the suprachiasmatic nucleus: gating by the circadian system.

Authors:  C S Colwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Excitatory mechanisms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus: the role of AMPA/KA glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Stephan Michel; Jason Itri; Christopher S Colwell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  GABAergic signaling induces divergent neuronal Ca2+ responses in the suprachiasmatic nucleus network.

Authors:  Robert P Irwin; Charles N Allen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Phenotype matters: identification of light-responsive cells in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Ilia N Karatsoreos; Lily Yan; Joseph LeSauter; Rae Silver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.