Literature DB >> 8953813

Report bias in drug research.

A H Bardy1.   

Abstract

Selective reporting of clinical trials to regulatory authorities could result in inappropriate marketing authorization decisions. The present study was conducted to uncover such potential bias, here called 'report bias'. In 1987 the number of clinical drug trials notified to Finnish National Agency for Medicines was 274. Up to the end of 1993, a final report or a statement that the trial had been suspended had only been received in the case of 91 studies. The outcome of 183 trials was not reported. These trials were not significantly different from those reported on, in their design, in blinding, or in the use of a comparator. The distribution in phases I to IV was similar in the reported and non-reported groups. Thus incomplete reporting was not caused by differences in the investigational plan. Other factors, such as differences in results, may be responsible. It is possible that findings that do not support commercial interests are less likely to be reported. This potential bias requires to be investigated and considered.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8953813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therapie        ISSN: 0040-5957            Impact factor:   2.070


  3 in total

1.  Is the randomized controlled drug trial in Europe lagging behind the USA?

Authors:  Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Mirjam J Knol; Robert J W Tijssen; Thed N van Leeuwen; Diederick E Grobbee; Dick de Zeeuw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Bias in reporting clinical trials.

Authors:  A H Bardy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years.

Authors:  Christian Gluud; Dimitrinka Nikolova
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.