Literature DB >> 19032722

Is the randomized controlled drug trial in Europe lagging behind the USA?

Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink1, Mirjam J Knol, Robert J W Tijssen, Thed N van Leeuwen, Diederick E Grobbee, Dick de Zeeuw.   

Abstract

AIMS: Performance of randomized controlled drug trials (drugRCTs) adds to the scientific output, scientific knowledge, scientific training and up-to-date status of healthcare and may drive economy. The purpose of this study was to benchmark Europe's position on drugRCTs relative to the rest of the world, and to identify factors that may drive this performance.
METHODS: The number of scientific publications on drugRCTs, indexed in PubMed and Thomson Scientific/Web of Science database over the period 1995-2004, was used as a proxy measure for the quantitative drugRCT output. The international citation impact of these publications was used as a proxy measure for the qualitative drugRCT output.
RESULTS: Country's origin of 103 211 publications was determined. After adjustment for population size, the number of drugRCT publications from Europe, USA and Australia/Japan was 102, 124 and 44 publications per million inhabitants, respectively. The proportional increase in publication output from 1995 until 2004 was lower in Europe compared with the USA and Australia/Japan (29.1, 40.1 and 63.4%, respectively). The number of citations per publication was 4.9 in Europe, 7.0 in the USA and 3.4 in Australia/Japan. Within Europe, the UK, Germany and Italy produced most publications. Country-specific factors associated with publication output in Europe were the number of pharmaceutical companies with headquarters in a country (R(2) = 0.71, P < 0.001), national R&amp;D expenditures by pharmaceutical companies (R(2) = 0.63, P < 0.001) and health-related R&amp;D expenditures by national governments (R(2) = 0.22, P = 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS: When adjusted for population size, quantitative and qualitative performance of drugRCTs in Europe lags behind the USA but is ahead of Australia/Japan. Several factors appear to explain the differences, among which are the number of headquarters of pharmaceutical companies in a country, the research expenditures by pharmaceutical companies, as well as health-related R&amp;D expenditures of a country. To enhance and strengthen Europe's position, researchers may strengthen their collaborations with local pharmaceutical companies, and national governments could increase their budgets for medical research funding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19032722      PMCID: PMC2675759          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  8 in total

1.  A decline in the U.S. share of research articles.

Authors:  Mahbubur Rahman; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States.

Authors:  Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-23

3.  Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Evelyne Decullier; Véronique Lhéritier; François Chapuis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-20

4.  Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; John P A Ioannidis; Apostolos A Analatos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-17

5.  Europe's research councils call for spending to be doubled to 0.25% of GDP.

Authors:  Rory Watson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-15

6.  Does the European clinical trials directive really improve clinical trial approval time?

Authors:  Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Daniela Dobre; Hans L Hillege; Diederick E Grobbee; Dick de Zeeuw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Report bias in drug research.

Authors:  A H Bardy
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.070

8.  Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years.

Authors:  Christian Gluud; Dimitrinka Nikolova
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Methodological characteristics of academic clinical drug trials--a retrospective cohort study of applications to the Danish Medicines Agency 1993-2005.

Authors:  Louise Berendt; Cecilia Håkansson; Karin F Bach; Per B Andreasen; Lene G Petersen; Elin Andersen; Henrik E Poulsen; Kim Dalhoff
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Money makes the world go round: the pervasiveness of pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  J M Ritter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Distribution of country of origin in studies used in Cochrane Reviews.

Authors:  Robert F Wolff; Stefan Reinders; Michael Barth; Gerd Antes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  All nations depend on the global knowledge pool--analysis of country of origin of studies used for health technology assessments in Germany.

Authors:  Kirsten H Herrmann; Robert Wolff; Fueloep Scheibler; Siw Waffenschmidt; Lars G Hemkens; Stefan Sauerland; Gerd Antes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.