Literature DB >> 8953683

Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: report from a Swedish Study Group.

B Brismar1, J E Akerlund, S Sjöstedt, C Johansson, A Törnqvist, B Bäckstrand, H Bång, L Andåker, P O Gustafsson, N Darle, M Angerås, A Falk, G Tunevall, B Kasholm-Tengve, T Skau, P O Nyström, T Gasslander, A Hagelbäck, B Olsson-Liljequist, A E Eklund, C E Nord.   

Abstract

118 patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections participated in an open randomized comparative multicenter trial in order to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of biapenem with imipenem/cilastatin (Tienam). 31 men and 27 women (mean age 52.3 years) were enrolled in the biapenem group, and 43 men and 17 women (mean age 52.3 years) in the imipenem/cilastatin group. The patients received either biapenem 500 mg every 8 h or imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg every 6 h by intravenous infusion for up to 13 days (mean 6.5 days). 28/43 evaluable patients (65.1%) receiving biapenem and 27/40 evaluable patients (67.5%) in the imipenem/cilastatin group were clinically cured. The microbiological response was satisfactory in 28/43 evaluable patients (65.1%) receiving biapenem and in 27/40 evaluable patients (67.5%) receiving imipenem/cilastatin. No significant differences in clinical or microbiological efficacy between the two treatment groups were found. The present study shows that biapenem may be useful in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8953683     DOI: 10.3109/00365549609037949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0036-5548


  8 in total

Review 1.  Use of newer quinolones for the treatment of intraabdominal infections: focus on clinafloxacin.

Authors:  C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; B Schubert; W Ebner; F Daschner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Biapenem.

Authors:  Caroline M Perry; Tim Ibbotson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Emerging strategies in infectious diseases: new carbapenem and trinem antibacterial agents.

Authors:  H S Sader; A C Gales
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Results of a clinical trial of clinafloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  J S Solomkin; S E Wilson; N V Christou; O D Rotstein; E P Dellinger; R S Bennion; R Pak; K Tack
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  In vitro activity of Biapenem plus RPX7009, a carbapenem combined with a serine β-lactamase inhibitor, against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; Diane M Citron; Kerin L Tyrrell; C Vreni Merriam
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Carbapenems vs tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lingyuan Chen; Xueyan Liang; Junsong Jiang; Xianshu Li; Yan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.