Literature DB >> 8953529

Comparison of pharyngeal, fecal, and cloacal samples for the isolation of Chlamydia psittaci from experimentally infected cockatiels and turkeys.

A A Andersen1.   

Abstract

Direct comparisons were made of chlamydial isolation rates from pharyngeal swabs, fecal samples, and cloacal swabs from cockatiels and pharyngeal and cloacal swabs from turkeys experimentally infected with Chlamydia psittaci. During pathogenesis studies, 133 paired specimens were collected from cockatiels and 118 paired specimens were collected from turkeys. Of the 51 cockatiel chlamydial infections detected, 80.4% were positive by the pharyngeal swab sample, 45.1% were positive by the fecal swab sample, and 37.3% were positive by the cloacal swab sample. Of the 87 turkey infections detected, 93.1% were positive by the pharyngeal swab sample and 77.0% were positive by the cloacal swab. The pharyngeal swabs were the most reliable sample for isolation of chlamydia from live birds. However, no single sampling site yielded positive results from all infected birds. Specimens from multiple sites are recommended because a number of infected birds were identified by isolation from only 1 sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8953529     DOI: 10.1177/104063879600800407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  7 in total

1.  Combating chlamydiosis.

Authors:  Helen O'Shea
Journal:  Bioeng Bugs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

2.  Experimental Chlamydia gallinacea infection in chickens does not protect against a subsequent experimental Chlamydia psittaci infection.

Authors:  Marloes Heijne; Jeanet van der Goot; Herma Buys; Annemieke Dinkla; Hendrik Jan Roest; Lucien van Keulen; Ad Koets
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Detection of Chlamydiaceae in Swiss wild birds sampled at a bird rehabilitation centre.

Authors:  Sandro Stalder; Hanna Marti; Nicole Borel; Prisca Mattmann; Barbara Vogler; Nina Wolfrum; Sarah Albini
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2020-11-12

4.  Use of a nested PCR-enzyme immunoassay with an internal control to detect Chlamydophila psittaci in turkeys.

Authors:  Marnix Van Loock; Kristel Verminnen; Trudy O Messmer; Guido Volckaert; Bruno M Goddeeris; Daisy Vanrompay
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  A cross sectional study on Dutch layer farms to investigate the prevalence and potential risk factors for different Chlamydia species.

Authors:  Marloes Heijne; Jeanet A van der Goot; Helmi Fijten; Joke W van der Giessen; Eric Kuijt; Catharina B M Maassen; Annika van Roon; Ben Wit; Ad P Koets; Hendrik I J Roest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Molecular Detection and Genotyping of Chlamydia psittaci in Captive Psittacines from Costa Rica.

Authors:  Jessica Sheleby-Elías; Antony Solórzano-Morales; Juan José Romero-Zuñiga; Gaby Dolz
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2013-09-18

Review 7.  Pathogen surveillance through monitoring of sewer systems.

Authors:  Ryan G Sinclair; Christopher Y Choi; Mark R Riley; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.086

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.