Literature DB >> 34801064

Experimental Chlamydia gallinacea infection in chickens does not protect against a subsequent experimental Chlamydia psittaci infection.

Marloes Heijne1, Jeanet van der Goot2, Herma Buys2, Annemieke Dinkla3, Hendrik Jan Roest3,4, Lucien van Keulen3, Ad Koets3,5.   

Abstract

Chlamydia psittaci was considered the predominant chlamydial species in poultry until Chlamydia gallinacea was discovered in 2009. C. psittaci is a zoonotic obligate intracellular bacterium reported in more than 465 bird species including poultry. In poultry, infections can result in asymptomatic disease, but also in more severe systemic illness. The zoonotic potential of C. gallinacea has yet to be proven. Infections in poultry appear to be asymptomatic and in recent prevalence studies C. gallinacea was the main chlamydial species found in chickens. The high prevalence of C. gallinacea resulted in the question if an infection with C. gallinacea might protect against an infection with C. psittaci. To investigate possible cross protection, chickens were inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_G47 and subsequently inoculated with either a different strain of C. gallinacea (NL_F725) or C. psittaci. Chickens that had not been pre-inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_G47 were used as a C. gallinacea or C. psittaci infection control. In the groups that were inoculated with C. psittaci, no difference in pharyngeal or cloacal shedding, or in tissue dissemination was observed between the control group and the pre-inoculated group. In the groups inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_F725, shedding in cloacal swabs and tissues dissemination was lower in the group pre-inoculated with C. gallinacea NL_G47. These results indicate previous exposure to C. gallinacea does not protect against an infection with C. psittaci, but might protect against a new infection of C. gallinacea.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chickens; Chlamydia; Cross immunity; Cross protection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34801064      PMCID: PMC8605536          DOI: 10.1186/s13567-021-01011-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of pharyngeal, fecal, and cloacal samples for the isolation of Chlamydia psittaci from experimentally infected cockatiels and turkeys.

Authors:  A A Andersen
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  Emerging Chlamydia psittaci infections in chickens and examination of transmission to humans.

Authors:  Stefanie Lagae; Isabelle Kalmar; Karine Laroucau; Fabien Vorimore; Daisy Vanrompay
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Emerging Chlamydia psittaci infections in the chicken industry and pathology of Chlamydia psittaci genotype B and D strains in specific pathogen free chickens.

Authors:  Lizi Yin; Isabelle D Kalmar; Stefanie Lagae; Stien Vandendriessche; Wannes Vanderhaeghen; Patrick Butaye; Eric Cox; Daisy Vanrompay
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Evidence for the existence of two new members of the family Chlamydiaceae and proposal of Chlamydia avium sp. nov. and Chlamydia gallinacea sp. nov.

Authors:  Konrad Sachse; Karine Laroucau; Konstantin Riege; Stefanie Wehner; Meik Dilcher; Heather Huot Creasy; Manfred Weidmann; Garry Myers; Fabien Vorimore; Nadia Vicari; Simone Magnino; Elisabeth Liebler-Tenorio; Anke Ruettger; Patrik M Bavoil; Frank T Hufert; Ramon Rosselló-Móra; Manja Marz
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 5.  Chlamydophila psittaci infections in birds: a review with emphasis on zoonotic consequences.

Authors:  Taher Harkinezhad; Tom Geens; Daisy Vanrompay
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Compendium of Measures to Control Chlamydia psittaci Infection Among Humans (Psittacosis) and Pet Birds (Avian Chlamydiosis), 2017.

Authors:  Gary Balsamo; Angela M Maxted; Joanne W Midla; Julia M Murphy; Ron Wohrle; Thomas M Edling; Pilar H Fish; Keven Flammer; Denise Hyde; Preeta K Kutty; Miwako Kobayashi; Bettina Helm; Brit Oiulfstad; Branson W Ritchie; Mary Grace Stobierski; Karen Ehnert; Thomas N Tully
Journal:  J Avian Med Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.557

7.  Efficacy of live Chlamydophila abortus vaccine 1B in protecting mice placentas and foetuses against strains of Chlamydophila pecorum isolated from cases of abortion.

Authors:  A Rekiki; A Bouakane; S Hammami; A H El Idrissi; F Bernard; A Rodolakis
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Pathogenicity of Chlamydia gallinacea in chickens after oral inoculation.

Authors:  Marloes Heijne; Jeanet van der Goot; Herma Buys; Annemieke Dinkla; Hendrik Jan Roest; Lucien van Keulen; Ad Koets
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Protective Effect of Vaccine Promoted Neutralizing Antibodies against the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Anja Weinreich Olsen; Emma Kathrine Lorenzen; Ida Rosenkrands; Frank Follmann; Peter Andersen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Seventy Years of Chlamydia Vaccine Research - Limitations of the Past and Directions for the Future.

Authors:  Samuel Phillips; Bonnie L Quigley; Peter Timms
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.