Literature DB >> 8951825

Early visual processing in neglect patients: a study with steady-state VEPs.

P Angelelli1, M De Luca, D Spinelli.   

Abstract

Reliable steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in a group of 19 right brain-damaged patients with visuospatial hemineglect (Neglect), and two control groups: 15 left brain-damaged (LBD) patients and 12 right brain-damaged (RBD) patients without neglect. Moreover, VEPs were recorded in two rare cases of left brain damage and right visuospatial hemineglect. Stimuli were gratings phase-reversed at various temporal frequencies presented in the left and right visual field. In the Neglect group, VEPs to stimuli displayed in the left visual field (contralesional stimuli) had longer latencies. The delay was not present for the two control groups. As regards the VEP amplitudes, the Neglect group data showed a less distinctive pattern than in the case of latency. VEPs to stimuli contralateral to the lesion were smaller than those recorded for stimuli ipsilateral to the lesion in both Neglect and RBD groups. On the contrary, the VEP amplitudes for the two hemifields were comparable in the LBD group. In the case of left brain damage and neglect, VEPs to right visual field stimuli had longer latencies and lower amplitudes compared to the ipsilesional responses in both patients. Overall, the data support the view that, in most cases, early visual processing is not intact in the neglected hemifield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8951825     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00036-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

1.  Loss of visual information in neglect: the effect of chromatic- versus luminance-contrast stimuli in a "what" task.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multimodal Imaging Evidence for a Frontoparietal Modulation of Visual Cortex during the Selective Processing of Conditioned Threat.

Authors:  Nathan M Petro; L Forest Gruss; Siyang Yin; Haiqing Huang; Vladimir Miskovic; Mingzhou Ding; Andreas Keil
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Spatial frames of reference and somatosensory processing: a neuropsychological perspective.

Authors:  G Vallar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Underestimation of contralateral space in neglect: a deficit in the "where" task.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesco Di Russo; Francesca Figliozzi; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Functional circuitry underlying natural and interventional cancellation of visual neglect.

Authors:  Bertram R Payne; R Jarrett Rushmore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual and spatial modulation of tactile extinction: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Chiara F Sambo; Giuseppe Vallar; Paola Fortis; Roberta Ronchi; Lucio Posteraro; Bettina Forster; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effects on neglect: a visual-evoked potential study.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Donatella Spinelli; Giuseppe Vallar; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.