Literature DB >> 8951269

Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure in neonatal respiratory failure.

M P Samuels1, J Raine, T Wright, J A Alexander, K Lockyer, S A Spencer, D S Brookfield, N Modi, D Harvey, C Bose, D P Southall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In uncontrolled clinical trials, negative extrathoracic pressure has been shown to be an effective respiratory support. We aimed to assess its role in the context of current neonatal intensive care.
DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial, with sequential analysis of matched pairs of infants. Matching was undertaken by stratified randomization from 15 groups divided according to gestational age, oxygen requirement, and whether patients were intubated at 4 hours of age.
SETTING: Two neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: Two hundred forty-four patients (birth weight 1.53 +/- 0.69 kg (mean +/- SD); gestational age 30.4 +/- 3.5 weeks) with respiratory failure.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized at 4 hours of age to receive either standard neonatal intensive care, or standard care plus continuous negative extrathoracic pressure (CNEP, -4 to -6 cmH2O) applied within a purpose-designed neonatal incubator. OUTCOME SCORES: Clinical scores were calculated for each infant at 56 days of age, or death if earlier. Scores included measures for mortality, respiratory outcome, the presence of cerebral ultrasound abnormalities, patent arterial duct, necrotizing enterocolitis, and retinopathy. The treatment given for the higher score for each pair was recorded and the cumulative net number of pairs favoring CNEP plotted in the sequential analysis to provide an ethical early termination strategy. Individual components of the outcome score and other secondary measurements were analyzed on completion of the trial.
RESULTS: The sequential analysis reached a decision boundary after 122 out of a possible maximum of 124 pairs were completed. The overall outcome score showed an overall significant benefit for CNEP. Secondary analysis showed that the use of CNEP was associated with an increase in mortality, cranial ultrasound abnormalities, and pneumothoraces, which were not statistically significant. However, 5% fewer patients were intubated (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-10), and the total duration of oxygen therapy among surviving infants at 56 days was lower (20.5 days, compared with 38.9 in controls; difference 18.4 days, 95% CI 3.8 to 33.0). Among all infants, the mean total duration of oxygen therapy was 18.3 days among CNEP-treated infants compared with 33.6 days among the controls (difference -15.3 days, 95% CI -0.2 to -30.4). This reduction in mean levels is entirely attributable to substantially fewer patients requiring prolonged oxygen therapy, the median duration of treatment being very similar in the two groups. As a result, commensurately fewer surviving infants showed chronic lung disease of prematurity.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of continuous negative pressure improves the respiratory outcome for neonates with respiratory failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8951269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  17 in total

1.  Babies and consent: yet another NHS scandal. But it should lead to improvements in research governance within the NHS.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-13

2.  Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Worst outcome of Griffiths report would be that research becomes increasingly difficult.

Authors:  T Stephenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-25

3.  Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.

Authors:  E Hey; I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

4.  Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research.

Authors:  D J Manning
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The Stoke CNEP Saga - how it damaged all involved.

Authors:  Teresa Wright
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.

Authors:  Jonathan Gornall
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can cause widespread, unpredictable damage.

Authors:  Edmund Hey; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Regulating research, regulating professionals.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Negative pressure ventilation in pediatric critical care setting.

Authors:  Akash Deep; Claudine De Munter; Ajay Desai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 10.  The role of negative pressure ventilation.

Authors:  A Thomson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.