Literature DB >> 20382904

Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can cause widespread, unpredictable damage.

Edmund Hey, Iain Chalmers.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382904      PMCID: PMC2853414          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.09k045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Open letter to the chief medical officer.

Authors:  I Chalmers; E Hey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

2.  Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.

Authors:  E Hey; I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

3.  Research ethics committees deserve support.

Authors:  John Alexander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-26

4.  The 1996 Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial: were parents' allegations of research fraud fraudulent?

Authors:  Edmund Hey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  CNEP and research governance.

Authors:  Rod Griffiths
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true?

Authors:  Edmund Hey; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The UK Panel of Research Integrity: a missed opportunity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Research governance: panacea or problem?

Authors:  Ash Samanta; Jo Samanta
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.659

9.  Abuse of people trying to protect children from abuse.

Authors:  E Hey; I Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-11-24       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure in neonatal respiratory failure.

Authors:  M P Samuels; J Raine; T Wright; J A Alexander; K Lockyer; S A Spencer; D S Brookfield; N Modi; D Harvey; C Bose; D P Southall
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Stoke CNEP Saga - how it damaged all involved.

Authors:  Teresa Wright
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga.

Authors:  Jonathan Gornall
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  'Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can have dire consequences' and 'Regulating research, regulating professionals'.

Authors:  Ian Kennedy; Michael Farthing
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Whistleblowing and patient safety: the patient's or the profession's interests at stake?

Authors:  Stephen Bolsin; Rita Pal; Peter Wilmshurst; Milton Pena
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency.

Authors:  Christopher A Mebane; John P Sumpter; Anne Fairbrother; Thomas P Augspurger; Timothy J Canfield; William L Goodfellow; Patrick D Guiney; Anne LeHuray; Lorraine Maltby; David B Mayfield; Michael J McLaughlin; Lisa S Ortego; Tamar Schlekat; Richard P Scroggins; Tim A Verslycke
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind Initiative, 2003-2013.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Patricia Atkinson; Mark Fenton; Lester Firkins; Sally Crowe; Katherine Cowan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.