Literature DB >> 8951095

Picture archiving and communication systems and vascular surgery: clinical impressions and suggestions for improvement.

B I Reiner1, E L Siegel, F Hooper, S M Pomerantz, Z Protopapas, E Pickar, L Killewich.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptance and clinical utility of a large scale picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for vascular surgery. Questionnaires and one-on-one interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses in the department of vascular surgery at the Baltimore VA Medical Center where PACS has been in routine, hospital-wide use for more than 2 1/2 years. The perceptions of the clinical staff were assessed to determine the efficacy of PACS in comparison to the conventional film based alternative for the practice of vascular surgery and suggestions for improvements were solicited. There was consensus among the vascular surgery staff members that the use of PACS enhanced their clinical practices, both in and out of the operating room (OR). Vascular surgeons heavily rely on image display in the OR as a "road map" to help determine their operative approach and to guide their surgery. PACS offers unique intraoperative imaging capabilities including rapid image retrieval and improved archival, cine review, the ability to modify image contrast, and the ability to obtain direct quantitative measurements of the degree of vascular stenosis. The increased accessibility and availability of images throughout the hospital enables improvement in time management and in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8951095     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  7 in total

1.  Hospital takes plunge into full-fledged PACS.

Authors:  E L Siegel
Journal:  Diagn Imaging (San Franc)       Date:  1993-02

2.  The hidden costs of delayed access to diagnostic imaging information: impact on PACS implementation.

Authors:  W H Straub; D Gur
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface.

Authors:  S C Horii
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS.

Authors:  P E Hilsenrath; W L Smith; K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D A Owen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Experience with image management networks at three universities: is the cup half-empty or half-full? 1989.

Authors:  Seong K Mun; Steve Horii; Harold R Benson; S H Lo; David Haynor; Alan Sarrinen; Yongmin Kim; John Loop; Melvyn Greberman; Robert Allman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Making filmless radiology work.

Authors:  E L Siegel; J N Diaconis; S Pomerantz; R Allman; B Briscoe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Total digital radiology: is it feasible? Or desirable?

Authors:  J E Gray; P R Karsell; G P Becker; D G Gehring
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.959

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Clinical input into designing a PACS.

Authors:  D M Yousem; N J Beauchamp
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Understanding financing options for PACS implementation. Picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Integration of radiographic images with an electronic medical record.

Authors:  J M Overhage; A Aisen; M Barnes; M Tucker; C J McDonald
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

4.  Establishing benchmarks for creation of a pro-forma economic model to evaluate filmless PACS operation.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; D Bradham; H Saunders; B Johnson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Physicians' views and assessments on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in two Turkish public hospitals.

Authors:  Mehmet Top
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): Clinician's Perspective About Filmless Imaging.

Authors:  G J Jorwekar; K N Dandekar; P K Baviskar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  A Qualitative Analysis of the Needs and Experiences of Hospital-based Clinicians when Accessing Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Séan Cronin; Bridget Kane; Gavin Doherty
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery : The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation.

Authors:  Thomas Wendler; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Nassir Navab; Matthias N van Oosterom
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 9.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.